"Why can't we all get along?" Rodney King
Ain't America great?
The range is looking good Ray.
Fredo keep on "keepin' on"
Ain't America great?
The range is looking good Ray.
Fredo keep on "keepin' on"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.22 Easling forty years ago..
Ray
New York, friend of P.O. Ackley.. Just another wasted space caseI seem to recall reading about some nut in Africa using a .22-06 with solid bullets at warp speed on big game? Pretty sure it was a slow twist barrel and light azz copper solid boolits...
ANYHOO, Quickload lists the case capacity of the .22-06Easling @ 62.50 grains.
As stated, the average capacity of five, 1x fired .220Redline cases is 70.95 grains.
The '06 is a long action case. Redline is a short action.
So, yeah...guess that's the same thing
![]()
New York, friend of P.O. Ackley.. Just another wasted space case
I think you have a bunch of wasted space, something a smaller case could do with the right powder..
22-284!Without any supporting details, you're again wasting bandwidth on "wasted space".
Keep thinking' about the "ignore" button, but instead, will re-state that you've added NOTHING tangible to support your position. Your trolling is patently obvious, without backing up your opinion with anything of merit...
I've only been indulging your trolling, because its shining light on you, under your bridge. Reckon I musta "panty wadded" (to use your term) you somewhere in the past to have been blessed with your attention?
One thing I'll tell ya STRAIGHT OUT.
If I disagree with ANYONE, I will absolutely, 100%, state my case for why I disagree. Then, the chips fall where they may, and everyone can make up their own mind...
Yet, here you are...sharing nothing of any substance, over and again.
Like I said, I've disagreed with lots of fellow shooters here in the last. But, unlike yourself, I state my case with details when sharing an opinion. Otherwise, I'd just be 'trolling'. And I happen to know a little bit about that...
![]()
So yeah, as long as Admin allows your frivolous posts to continue, have at it, hoss! It's your online persona you're discrediting, not mine. I'm welcome to disagree, and everyone comes out the wiser for the discussion. So, here's yet another opportunity for you to state your case!
Please explain how the use of slow burn 'magnum' powders in a large capacity 'overbore' cartridge is "wasting space?"
Please reference the .224 caliber hotrods you've built and/or shot out in your past to support your opinion for how to safely reach 3900+ from a 75grain bullet, with less powder, from a smaller case.
As a reminder, here are your words, Post #160:
Please explain.
It's a good one and in a SA platform BUT still considerably less in powder cap than Fredo's choice cartridge. I'm guessing it's on the heels in performance but not quite there.22-284!
I read on Long range where a guy used Re33 and had super velocity. I searched for that article but couldn't find it. It was well north of 4000. I believe it also had a long throat.It's a good one and in a SA platform BUT still considerably less in powder cap than Fredo's choice cartridge. I'm guessing it's on the heels in performance but not quite there.
Probably in the long action loaded extremely long. Wouldn't make the SA mag length.I read on Long range where a guy used Re33 and had super velocity. I searched for that article but couldn't find it. It was well north of 4000. I believe it also had a long throat.
I know the 22-284 broke the speed record years ago. Almost 6000 with a iron sintered bullet. Matt
why shouldn't they allow my posts? Again I didn't start the attack just because I had another view..Without any supporting details, you're again wasting bandwidth on "wasted space".
Keep thinking' about the "ignore" button, but instead, will re-state that you've added NOTHING tangible to support your position. Your trolling is patently obvious, without backing up your opinion with anything of merit...
I've only been indulging your trolling, because its shining light on you, under your bridge. Reckon I musta "panty wadded" (to use your term) you somewhere in the past to have been blessed with your attention?
One thing I'll tell ya STRAIGHT OUT.
If I disagree with ANYONE, I will absolutely, 100%, state my case for why I disagree. Then, the chips fall where they may, and everyone can make up their own mind...
Yet, here you are...sharing nothing of any substance, over and again.
Like I said, I've disagreed with lots of fellow shooters here in the last. But, unlike yourself, I state my case with details when sharing an opinion. Otherwise, I'd just be 'trolling'. And I happen to know a little bit about that...
![]()
So yeah, as long as Admin allows your frivolous posts to continue, have at it, hoss! It's your online persona you're discrediting, not mine. I'm welcome to disagree, and everyone comes out the wiser for the discussion. So, here's yet another opportunity for you to state your case!
Please explain how the use of slow burn 'magnum' powders in a large capacity 'overbore' cartridge is "wasting space?"
Please reference the .224 caliber hotrods you've built and/or shot out in your past to support your opinion for how to safely reach 3900+ from a 75grain bullet, with less powder, from a smaller case.
As a reminder, here are your words, Post #160:
Please explain.
Either will the SAUM if throated where it will perform. MattProbably in the long action loaded extremely long. Wouldn't make the SA mag length.
Oh really. Never would have guessed with a .224 at 75 grains, it would be loaded longer than 2.975. I guess I thought the SAUM was a shorter case than a 308 case.Either will the SAUM if throated where it will perform. Matt