Mulligan
Silver $$ Contributor
.260 is a bit light for elk at any distancewhy not do one caliber--.260 or .260 improved. 8" twist. then you don't have to mess around with 2 barrels
CW
.260 is a bit light for elk at any distancewhy not do one caliber--.260 or .260 improved. 8" twist. then you don't have to mess around with 2 barrels
depends on bullet speed...I don't know about the 260 straight but the 260AI in a 26" barrel with a 140 at 3,000 + FPS is good for elk to 1K...I seen the best of the west guys smoke a big bull at 950 with a 6.5/284 and a 140 dropped him right there also seen them wack a cow elk at 600 yards with a 243 and a 105gr ..in my testing yes the high BC High SD and bullet impact speed make it all work..now hit the same target 200 FPS slower and it does not work as well.. The 6.5 cal 140 class bullets are among the very best out there..They been killing moose with them for a century. the farther away the target the higher the muzzle velocity needs to be..we know for sure the 6mm 105's work well on deer out to 750 yards at 3,150 FPS slow it down to 2,950 FPS then 600 yards becomes questionable. just my experience and what I have seen from others..260 is a bit light for elk at any distance
CW
[QUOTE="FJIM,
Switch barrel rifles are not that great..you will get tired of it fast. cool idea..but..
Na.260 is a bit light for elk at any distance
CW
Most guys that do this stuff are very proficient shots. A 260 is a great elk round. Not the best but still a great choice with the proper bullet and velocity. Yes, maybe you'll need range limitations. Many don't like shooting past 400-500 on game anyway. Perfect range for the 6.5 bullets..260 is a bit light for elk at any distance
CW
Well, if you consider the smallest caliber allowed to hunt elk with in Colorado is 6mm with 1000 ft lbs of energy at 100 yards. The beloved .260 is a lot closer to the lower end allowed in the field than some of the heavier cartridges that share the same bolt face the op is working with.
It is all shot placement . I have a friend that got two with one shot shooting 100 GR muzzy broadheads shooting a bow and arrowif the .260 wont do an elk in due to lack of energy or what have you, then archery should not be allowed, or handgun too. even though I have not hunted elk yet, seeing what the round is capable of and the wide selection of bullets, I wouldn't feel under gunned taking one out. but then again, I hunt deer in iowa with a handgun where a lot of others use a 12 gauge slug to kill them.
Well sure the 6mm at 100 with 1000 ft lbs of energy would be like maybe a light weight varmint bullet. The 105s are a different bullet entirely. Everyone has a minimum comfort zone caliber /cartridge they prefer. That's apparent on this and every other forum. Nothing wrong with that. I'm not sure I'd use a 243 on elk personally even tho I've seen numerous killed with one. The 6.5 caliber would be my minimum.Well, if you consider the smallest caliber allowed to hunt elk with in Colorado is 6mm with 1000 ft lbs of energy at 100 yards. The beloved .260 is a lot closer to the lower end allowed in the field than some of the heavier cartridges that share the same bolt face the op is working with.
CW
And he reports his new build is a 308! A modern bullet with minimum designed terminal velocity will get it done, meaning a big hole. Large scale studies conclude a proper size wound channel is what kills, not the opposing ends of the spectrum of pass through vs energy dump.