Check today's Bulletin re Whidden dies.
I never saw any of them or their bullets win a benchrest match. Mattsawacs
In Glen Zediker book "HANDLOADING FOR COMPETITION" he states the case body should be sized .003 to .005 smaller in diemeter than its fired diameter. This allows the case to spring back from the chamber walls and extract reliably.
If you did anything I would just buy a .223 Forster full length benchrest die and have the neck honed to your desired diameter. And I would also buy a set of Redding competition shell holders to accurately control the amount of shoulder bump without touching the die.
And remember what the late Jim Hull of the Sierra ballistic test lab humorously said about full length resizing.
"The cartridge should fit the chamber like a rat turd in a violin case"
Click on the image below and read what Kevin Thomas of Team Lapua USA has to say.
![]()
Then that is what you should tell him. Plain and simple. AR and bolt action is a complete different platform and reloading techniques. Mattdkhunt
sawacs is loading two cartridges for a AR15 platform the 6.8 SPC,and 6mm AR, and I do not think a AR15 type rifle is used in benchrest competition. And I'm also not sure if sawacs 6.5-284 is being used for benchrest competition either.
So forgive me for thinking outside the benchrest box.![]()
I asked the question a few months ago about the difference in accuracy between a custom and standard off the shelf die, like Forster. Iirc nobody could prove any difference. Barlow
I use a Wilson case gage to determine ideal headspace and trim length. As per a phone conversation with the tech at LE Wilson their F/L bushing die will minimum resize the body without overworking the brass you can adjust headspace by use of the threads on the die.Rather than worrying about setting the die up for the proper amount of shoulder bump, I am seriously considering going the custom die route for a few of the cartridges I reload for (6.8 SPC, 6.5-284, 6mm AR)
If I were to head down this road, do you guys have any recommendations on how to proceed?
For example, for the 6.8 SPC which is in an AR-15 platform, should I fire a few rounds one time each and send those cases off to have a custom die made or go to the trouble of creating a cast of the chamber? My goal with the 6.8 is to be able to run the case through the die, size the case body while bumping the shoulder back the right amount and sizing the neck down for .003 neck tension.
When it comes to a bolt action, such as my 6.5-284, should I fire the cases a few times without bumping the shoulder back or make a chamber cast?
Lastly, who would you fellas recommend to have a custom die made?
Advice would be most appreciated.
Thanks!
you can make straight cases with some lee dies too but who wants to not be able to adjust neck tension during load development or as the brass ages. You can collect a whole pile of dies trying to find straight ones or just get a fl whidden bushing die and be done with it.
Not to break up this party, but the best shooters as far as pure accuracy are of the benchrest variety. If you have a problem with that statement, enter a match and publish how you did. I am not saying that I shoot with the best of them at all, but I have followed those games pretty closely for a couple of decades or more. I think that I can say with great confidence that while they all pretty much full length size, that they would completely reject the whole rat turn in a violin idea. Before you argue with their position on this, as yourself who shoots better than who. Sometimes I get really tired of reading bad advice on the internet.
I suck at shooting but can’t avoid controversy... wouldn’t a normal shooter more closely replicate the br shooters by using thier standard equipment like a collet to neck size? Or is a standard fl sizer going to more closely replicate the fit? I imagine a custom fl die is still going to be a tight fit, just more presice and consistent brass after brass.
If I ever build a custom gun and custom chamber I’ll without a doubt go custom fl sizing as that is what I’m told is done with br. But the boat I’m in now I feel that I’d rather just use my ff brass and neck size. Granted it’s been a while since I sat down at a desk with all the measurement averages to see the difference between the two options in relation to what I guess my chamber specs are. I guess unless I can tell you the exact measurement of my chamber and then pose the sizing question in a matter of numbers, I couldn’t get a straight forward answer since that question would be far to vague.
very true. It’s defiantly a conscious sacrifice. Where is the consistency when 2 shots to get ff’ed then you got maybe 4 to 10 from there before you should fl size again. I’m just going to have to look at my measurements again and bust out the headspace thing for my calipers. I grew too fond of the neck size only with ff brass theory lol always open minded though.You can neck size to get a tight chamber fit with the brass, but eventually after so many firings the brass will start getting difficult to chamber and extract. Then you have to FL size the case to make it fit properly again.
I used to neck size when I first started reloading thinking I could maintain a tight chamber fit. And it did. But once I realized I had to eventually FL size the cases due yo chambering issues and my body/shoulder dimensions were all over the place, I saw no point in neck sizing alone. FL sizing also allows you to control consistency in the overall case dimensions. Neck sizing does not control anything but the neck and let's the shoulder and body of the case do whatever it wants after each firing. No consistency there.