And I respect your choiceGlock is a pack gun. That's why I went FN.
And I respect your choiceGlock is a pack gun. That's why I went FN.
I like springfield as a company but less moving parts is my standard. If somebody came out with a glock copy with 1 less mechanical part id go that routeWhat no love for the Springfield Armory XD?
Do pants count?
Well, that's not what you actually said. You said if the "user" pulls the trigger. Hence my request for clarification.As long as they squeeze the trigger like I said it cannot go off unless someone or some thing pulls the trigger
As long as they squeeze the trigger like I said it cannot go off unless someone or some thing pulls the trigger
I got one from canada- even betterView attachment 1166593 Best of both worlds.
Para ordnance 14-45. When they were in NC.
Let's face it, there's only one reason that 95% of all law enforcement agencies have the Glock pistol in their officers holsters. They are the most trusted and dependable defense pistol out there. Period. If not, they wouldn't be used so much in Law enforcement. Just that simple.
The SIG P320 had a post production issue discovered where it could go off if dropped a certain way. Turns out that it was fine if dropped in all the ways the .mil testing requires. So it passed. But drop it just so, and it goes off.Not a Glock, heck not a pistol, my freind had a Win 52 with a Canjar trigger set in ounces. You couldn't tap the stock or it'd fire, you couldn't open the bolt on a loaded chamber cause it would fire. This was an just an unsafe weapon period! In this case you didn't have to pull the trigger, very dangerous! Now I saw something about a Sig elsewhere seems like that had a problem with going off with no trigger pull but I may be wrong, have to look it up, but that would be a design problem.
You hit the nail on the head. I’ve read that a Glock costs 1/3 the mfg. cost of a P226.You were close. You had the first part of the statement right: "Let's face it, there's only one reason that 95% of all law enforcement agencies have the Glock pistol in their officers holsters:"
But that reason is cost. Glock practically gives them away for LEO pricing. A department can buy glocks and sell them used as police trade in for nearly the same price. Add to that the durability and low maintenance, and equipping a department with Glock is almost always the lowest cost solution overall.
It happens to be that they are also superbly reliable and dependable. But that's not the main reason departments use them. If there was someone offering a comparable pistol for less, they'd use that. But it's really tough to beat Glock on cost of mfg. Based on my knowledge of machining and molding costs in volume, I'd stand confidently by the assertion that GLOCK has less than $100 in each standard frame gun they sell. (17/19/22/23/31/32).
ETA-- incidentally, the lowball price is ultimately why SIG got the military contract over GLOCK for the M17/18 pistols. They out-glocked GLOCK.
I got one from canada- even better
Yes and yes. Remington will destroy them just like they did rohrbaugh and marlin to name a fewyep, couldn’t find one from Canada when shopping. I just meant to point out this particular one is from nc. Kinda cool that it was made 1/2hr from me.
I think Remington bought them?