I’m switching over from single stage presses and inline seaters to loading on a Dillon 750. I’ve honed the shell plate, done all the Armanov upgrades. My current SDs are consistently sub 7 currently, and while my shoulder bump was dead nuts 2 thou on the Dillon setup, I’m going to test each component addition on the Dillon just for myself one at a time, ensuring primer seating and bullet seating retain similar low SDs to my sub-7s from single stage, at least single digit.
My question comes in at lubing on the 750. I currently (with single stage) use die wax for resizing, tumble just to remove lube, then use imperial dry neck lube before my mandrel and bullet seating (2 different lubes). But I’m left in a quandary as to maintain my lubing process, while only using two die heads and two total passes on the progressive. So I need to change up my lube process. My thoughts are below….
1. Anneal
First Pass
2. Die wax lube inside and outside of case neck (or switch to one shot?)
3. Dedicated deprime
4. Shoulder bump
5. Mandrel
6. Mandrel again, because things.
7. Dry tumble lube off, then trim on giraud
Second pass
8. Dry lube inside case neck and into case feeder
9. Dedicated deprime #2 to knock any media out
10. Prime
11. Charge
12. Seat
Going back and forth between…
-die wax or Hornady one shot when I’m lubing once before sizing and mandrels in one pass, as I generally wax lube case, size, tumble, then dry lube before mandrel (2 steps of different lube)
-does lubing inside case necks before mandrel really matter at all, if I’ve honed the mandrels to 14,000 grit?
-I read if using dry lube inside case necks, some are even removing carbon with a bronze brush before applying the neck lube. I would be open to trying this, just don’t want to add tons more variables to test to my process as I make the switch to a progressive
Edit- let’s throw one more in there, not because I’ve tested, but just because I have the equipment to. I normally mandrel my lapua .284 brass twice to hit different angles, and use .284 21st century mandrels for 1/2 thou tension after spring back. Any benefit to progressively expanding? Such as a pass at .2835 mandrel followed by .2840 instead of twice on .2840?
Yes I know none of this matters at all when you can’t read the wind, I’m simply trying to advantageously utilize the equipment I have on hand and my current processes.
My question comes in at lubing on the 750. I currently (with single stage) use die wax for resizing, tumble just to remove lube, then use imperial dry neck lube before my mandrel and bullet seating (2 different lubes). But I’m left in a quandary as to maintain my lubing process, while only using two die heads and two total passes on the progressive. So I need to change up my lube process. My thoughts are below….
1. Anneal
First Pass
2. Die wax lube inside and outside of case neck (or switch to one shot?)
3. Dedicated deprime
4. Shoulder bump
5. Mandrel
6. Mandrel again, because things.
7. Dry tumble lube off, then trim on giraud
Second pass
8. Dry lube inside case neck and into case feeder
9. Dedicated deprime #2 to knock any media out
10. Prime
11. Charge
12. Seat
Going back and forth between…
-die wax or Hornady one shot when I’m lubing once before sizing and mandrels in one pass, as I generally wax lube case, size, tumble, then dry lube before mandrel (2 steps of different lube)
-does lubing inside case necks before mandrel really matter at all, if I’ve honed the mandrels to 14,000 grit?
-I read if using dry lube inside case necks, some are even removing carbon with a bronze brush before applying the neck lube. I would be open to trying this, just don’t want to add tons more variables to test to my process as I make the switch to a progressive
Edit- let’s throw one more in there, not because I’ve tested, but just because I have the equipment to. I normally mandrel my lapua .284 brass twice to hit different angles, and use .284 21st century mandrels for 1/2 thou tension after spring back. Any benefit to progressively expanding? Such as a pass at .2835 mandrel followed by .2840 instead of twice on .2840?
Yes I know none of this matters at all when you can’t read the wind, I’m simply trying to advantageously utilize the equipment I have on hand and my current processes.
Last edited:
