6MMsteve
Gold $$ Contributor
I think I will go up and chk the distance between the case mouth and the start of the bore I will do this with Bore cam, just to get some idea, but I think all my chambers are just standard I haven't got into buying reamers this go around of shooting, been about 25yrs and boy have I learned alot in the last 2yrsSome very good info here and I'll give my 2 cents. I think a lotta carbon issues are due to excess end clearance on case neck to chamber and running the slower powders at a conservative charge from what I have seen. I have personally pulled a few of my reamer specs back on case length to where I can control clearance on case trimming. some of the calibers I run will never get to sammi spec on the brass available and I want to control my neck clearance on case trim. I also make a pilot the same diameter of my turned neck and modify a case so I absolutely know where my neck clearance is running. I try to keep this clearance to a minimum around .008. that I can control. I don't think this eliminates the problem but a .008 ring is a lot easier to deal with than a .020 or a .030. Dave kiff and I visited about this some years ago on the reamer deal, and some very talented names where brought up that abides by this. I agree with boyd, once there, aint no chemical gonna get it out but my borescope tells me when I need to scrub and a .008 ring sure enough easier than them big logs rollers I've dealt with and often enough a normal regiment keeps the thinner ring under control. One thing kiff brought to my attention when we got to talken about this mess, if a feller gonna get on the tight side of end clearance better make a pilot same O.D as neck than using the bought ones or your gonna get a false reading with the taper in chamber the reamer cuts. I'm sure the discipline we shoot is a deciding factor as well on determining how critical the above applies to. Bill