i am going to follow your lead on this... i think i've been keeping my brass too short, and start to panic when it approaches book length.I also started trimming the min off my brass to try and keep that "gap" between brass and chamber to a minimum
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i am going to follow your lead on this... i think i've been keeping my brass too short, and start to panic when it approaches book length.I also started trimming the min off my brass to try and keep that "gap" between brass and chamber to a minimum
Will be watching this. Any idea of the chemical compound?
i am going to follow your lead on this... i think i've been keeping my brass too short, and start to panic when it approaches book length.
I did some quick tests awhile back with permatex gasket remover on the top of some old 2 stroke motocross bike pistons as I had read it worked wonders for removing carbon deposits. Well I tried it on a piston that was completely covered with carbon that was hard enough that one would need a wire wheel to remove it. I sprayed the top of the piston and let it sit for 10 minutes. It dissolved that carbon into a black paste that wiped off with one pass of a rag and the top of the piston looked brand new. I tried wipeout and sweets on another piston I had that was carboned up just as bad and even after sitting for an hour the Wipeout and Sweets never even touched it. The permatex was on a different level of carbon removal. I have been wondering for quite some time if it would make short work of these carbon rings and im thinking it possibly would. I tried a bit on the outside of a stainless barrel and it never etched the steel or did any damage that I could see and am getting closer to cleaning my 6br bore with it. I have some old barrels lying around that are real dirty but I don't own a bore scope to see the results. Anyone that owns a bore scope want to give it a go on an old barrel and see if it will remove a carbon ring?
I have been following this forum, and see lots of talk about a carbon ring, and I am not familiar with it. What is it, and where does it appear? What causes it? How do you remove it? What effect does it have on accuracy?
I want to improve my accuracy and learn more about accurate shooting. Thanks in advance for your instruction on this matter.
I did some quick tests awhile back with permatex gasket remover on the top of some old 2 stroke motocross bike pistons as I had read it worked wonders for removing carbon deposits. Well I tried it on a piston that was completely covered with carbon that was hard enough that one would need a wire wheel to remove it. I sprayed the top of the piston and let it sit for 10 minutes. It dissolved that carbon into a black paste that wiped off with one pass of a rag and the top of the piston looked brand new. I tried wipeout and sweets on another piston I had that was carboned up just as bad and even after sitting for an hour the Wipeout and Sweets never even touched it. The permatex was on a different level of carbon removal. I have been wondering for quite some time if it would make short work of these carbon rings and im thinking it possibly would. I tried a bit on the outside of a stainless barrel and it never etched the steel or did any damage that I could see and am getting closer to cleaning my 6br bore with it. I have some old barrels lying around that are real dirty but I don't own a bore scope to see the results. Anyone that owns a bore scope want to give it a go on an old barrel and see if it will remove a carbon ring?
the Lyman borescope will do you well, it will show you what you don't know about cleaning barrels, and you can use it on dies and other things your curiosity conjures. I have checked alot of dies finish surface and Whidden dies are polished very well. You can check chambers on guns crowns and locking lug areasI believe I have just learned something important in reading this thread. Thanks to each of you who have posted about the carbon ring as I was unaware of such a thing but can now see why I am having a bit of trouble chambering a round in both my Swift and a 243 truck gun. Seems like a borescope will be in my near future.
The can I have Says Dichloromethane, Toluene, ethanol and isobutane on the back. Maybe they changed the formula or something.http://www.permatex.eu/wp-content/u...IZADOR-DE-INYECTORES-ELIMINADOR-DE-JUNTAS.pdf
I doubt whats in this will do little more than penetrate the surface, it may loosen it??? It's primarily Acetone by the look of it.
The can I have Says Dichloromethane, Toluene, ethanol and isobutane on the back. Maybe they changed the formula or something.
... and if you vigorously JB a new, never-fired barrel you’ll get back black patches from the metal being removed. All that’s black may not be from just ‘carbon’.
Can you expound upon this, please? I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. (?)
6PPC .262 NECKI am going to politely disagree. The thing that happens at the end of the neck part of the chamber is real, but I believe that there is some confusion on the terminology, or perhaps there is a need for some clarification. The material in that area is simply powder fouling that stacks up (more or less depending on the powder)in an area where "normal" cleaning methods may not be effective in removing it. As the poster stated, it can be a problem, and should be dealt with in normal cleaning. One thing that was not mentioned is that if cases of different lengths are used, powder fouling left from the use of the shorter cases, can impinge on the mouths of longer cases, affecting consistency of bullet release. Getting past that for a moment, the other area that needs to be mentioned is the build up of what is generally referred to as hard carbon. This material is powder fouling on steroids that has been transformed by pressure into something that cannot be removed by any chemical or brush. It can be seen right where the freebore starts, at the top of the chamfer at the end of the neck part of the chamfer, very slightly down the barrel from the powder fouling buildup that was previously described. It can also be found in the back end of the bore, usually in the back third or so of the barrel. Various procedures involving the use of IOSSO are the most effective means of removing these deposits. I use a method that I learned by reading how Tony Boyer did is back in the late 90s, and have not changed it. More recently the manufacturer has a different set of instructions. I assume that they work as well. Some powders such as 133 do not have this problem.Others do, to the extent that for types of shooting that involve extended strings between cleaning, such as varmint shooting, that this may be a major factor in powder selection. One example would be using VV 140 in the .204 Ruger. Shooters have found that the hard carbon buildup was so fast and extensive that a change in powder was required. A middle ground powder may require treatment every hundred rounds or so to stay ahead of the problem. None of this can be properly evaluated without the use of a bore scope, except to say that I did this and the problem went away.
