• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

7mm PRC?

I'm honestly enjoying this forum way more than others, already.

I'm trying to put together a list of wind drift, drop, energy, fps and coal for different bullets.
 
A .284 in a medium action?
Intermediate actions are almost ideal for the 284 Win.

Lots of Mausers out there in 284 Win.

One thing to keep in mind is barrel length.
Some of these guys running in F-Class competitions & such may use a much longer barrel than you if your planning on hunting, like you originally stated.
 
Last edited:
What do you want to know ? This forum is the best place for asking specific questions.
The only bullets with high grains for the .284 I'd be interested in, is a 168 grain barnes lrx, the 175 grain partition abd the 175 grain hornady eld-x.

I believe the 160 grain accubond will fit fine, if I've read everything correctly.

Unsure obviously on energy down range and FPS obviously if I was to use the full availabile 3.110 COAL.
 
The only bullets with high grains for the .284 I'd be interested in, is a 168 grain barnes lrx, the 175 grain partition abd the 175 grain hornady eld-x.

I believe the 160 grain accubond will fit fine, if I've read everything correctly.

Unsure obviously on energy down range and FPS obviously if I was to use the full availabile 3.110 COAL.
If you use the popular 284 powders (H4831sc/H4350) you'll definitely be in the 3000+ fps range with the 168s. I use RL17 because it gets me there with the 2.975 OAL. The 4350 will for sure get you well into the 3000s.
 
If you use the popular 284 powders (H4831sc/H4350) you'll definitely be in the 3000+ fps range with the 168s. I use RL17 because it gets me there with the 2.975 OAL. The 4350 will for sure get you well into the 3000s.
Should I use quickloads to get more specific data or is there another tool?
 
Not easy to always find, what powder/s are, but RL26 always seems to be a top performer in the 284 case. I probably use more RL26 than all other powders combined. It works very well in my 6.5-284 with 140's.
 
Should I use quickloads to get more specific data or is there another tool?
QL certainly isn't the gospel but it can be a very useful tool and, for me, if I input the correct specific information to the cartridge I'm working with it's generally pretty damn close.
 
If you use the popular 284 powders (H4831sc/H4350) you'll definitely be in the 3000+ fps range with the 168s. I use RL17 because it gets me there with the 2.975 OAL. The 4350 will for sure get you well into the 3000s.
But at what barrel length?
I'm no where near those velocities with my 24" barrel on a commercial Mauser action.
 
The only bullets with high grains for the .284 I'd be interested in, is a 168 grain barnes lrx, the 175 grain partition abd the 175 grain hornady eld-x.

I believe the 160 grain accubond will fit fine, if I've read everything correctly.

Unsure obviously on energy down range and FPS obviously if I was to use the full availabile 3.110 COAL.
G7 in order. .256, .245, .358, .236.
The 168 Long range Accu Bond is .332.
Since the Partition is a flat base you should enter the. G1 bc. .478
Barnes are often a bit lower bc.
BC’s From the Applied Balistics App. which is often more accurate than the bullet manufacturers in my experience.
JBM Balistics is online, free and shows energy.
Adjust the velocities so muzzle energies match those 168’s at 3000 and you’ll have a rough idea which way to go relatively speaking. Have fun.
 
But at what barrel length?
I'm no where near those velocities with my 24" barrel on a commercial Mauser action.
I'm at 25". With H4350 and 162s, I've been hitting 2920 with my 2.975 OAL. My thought process is with a 3.1", he should be in the 3000s fairly easy if he's looking for that number. Velocity isn't everything but for me I tried for that 3K with my preferred bullet weight. If you shot RL17, that number is easily achievable and not a hot load. I prefer RL17 as it's easier to make velocity I want with less work. It's accurate also.
 
Last edited:
Numbers wise besides the fact the .284 is a .308 bolt face, compared to the 6.5 PRC and 6.8 western, it's not as much energy being carried at range. Very interesting
 
Numbers wise besides the fact the .284 is a .308 bolt face, compared to the 6.5 PRC and 6.8 western, it's not as much energy being carried at range. Very interesting
Not sure I follow. Your not gaining anything going from a 284 to a 7mm PRC or 6.8 Western of any significance. Kinda why IMO it's not worth jumping into a magnum bolt action. Opinions vary of course. For me it just wasn't worth it for what I wanted.
 
I dunno.
The more i look at it, the more it interests me.
But different interests me.
Hence why i'm looking at the 7mm LRM & 7.21 Lazzeroni Tomahawk.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,881
Messages
2,185,802
Members
78,561
Latest member
Ebupp
Back
Top