Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I decided to start with the Hornady 178 HPBT. May try the edm-m or -x at some point.
Should have plenty of scope.. NF ATACR.. had 30 moa when I had it on a 0moa rail.. now it's on a 20 moa rail. Unless I have it on backwards![]()
Yeah, I didn't state that correctly.. I did a tall target test to 30 moa with the 0 moa base, the scope had more.. and now definitely enough with the 20 moa rail.The 178 BTHP is a good bullet. Should work well for you. If you wanted to try the ELDs then stick with the M as the X is a hunting bullet.
And you should have more than 30 moa of up elevation on an ATACR on a 0 base.
I was being a bit humorous, but he should only need around 15 MoA to 600, assuming a 100 zero, with a 168g at 2750, but 34 to reach a 1000. The March scopes generally have +/- 30 MoA elevation. A quarter turn from the top should be around +27.5 MoA. - 10 MoA per revolution.He only had a 0 MOA rail on his rifle. I shoot a 6.5 CM and from 600 to 1000 is around 18 more minutes for me to dial up. So I estimated he would probably need that much more to do it.
It depends on several factors but I know, at 4000' elevation, I can get to 1000 yards with a 155 Berger out of my 20" FN Patrol.At the 20" and under barrel length, it is a maybe they will hit anything past 800. Have seen ONE 18" barrel that would still get the job done at 900, but nothing at 1K.
A myth, That's what those are. A story started by berger lovers to keep us looking for Sierra's instead of berbers.In addition to those already mentioned, you'll definitely want to check out the new 169 SMK's.
You mean they "learned" what we "learned" in Nam in the sixties about the 168 ? Don't shoot at anything smaller than a Jeep beyond 700 yards ?The local Sherriff's office was issuing 168s to the snipers and they try to not have to make long shoots. But homeland (or somebody with clout) is making them get better at what they do. So they tried 168s at 1000 and decide they needed a very big target when they went subsonic. With other tests with 175s and 168s some 168s did better. The initial batch they tried it was comical.
Understand that completely with the older bullet designs. The BC on the 168 eldm is actually higher than the 175 Sierra which can help make up the difference. I've never tried the 178 eldm or the 185 Jugg as my barrel is a 12 twist. My 20 is a gas gun with a 10 twist and is respectable to 800.You mean they "learned" what we "learned" in Nam in the sixties about the 168 ? Don't shoot at anything smaller than a Jeep beyond 700 yards ?![]()
Uh thats a hard NO on the 168 SMK it wont make it……168 - AMax, ELDm, ELDx
168 - Custom Competition or RDF's
168 SMK's or TMK's
155 CC or RDF's
Biggest deal, as usual, find out what your barrel likes.
I find IMR4064 is a good powder with the 168 weight bullets.