• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

20 Sploder

Frank G.
Thanks for posting that info about bolt head imprints at 80,000 psi.
When I bought my BI Centenial Ruger 77 in 220 SWIFT ,Ruger had TEST fired it and you could read on the bolt face, in brass, "W W 220 SWIFT" . I always wondered how hot their test loads were. Thanks again.

Hal

Maybe an equally important question would be "how soft was the bolt head?" on that particular rifle. And yes, I've heat treated materials.
 
TA
The bolt head is fine. Soft brass won't indent the harder steel. They don't make brass center punches.
The test load was high enough pressure that it left brass on the face of the bolt. You could read what case was used for a test load.
The brass deposite wore off with a little use.

Hal
 
Last edited:
Some time back, early 1990's I believe, there was an article in Precision Shooting. If memory serves, the author's last name was White. (No, I'm not gonna search for it) He and another fellow tested the effect of less body taper, ie if the Ackley thing of less case taper had any bearing on bolt pressure. They set up a device to hold a T/C barrel, just the barrel, chambered in 30-30 and fire it remotely, safely. The 30-30 case has a lot of taper. That case shot out the back. Rechambered to 30-30AI and repeated.....the case didn't come out. It was a long time ago and I don't remember if it stayed in completely or came part way out. But I do remember the results. Ackley-ized chamberings do have less back thrust than parent cases with more body taper. And top end loads work well, they like to be pushed, where the standard cartridge very often doesn't.

About velocity. Well, I've tested 3 different 223AI. All chambered by the same riflebuilder with my reamer - .250nk, 0 FB.. The good one - 25" Schneider 14tw - with 40 BT's and 2015 powder, IMI brass, 7-1/2 primer. Accuracy /working loads chrono about 4100 to nearly 4200. Same exact 4100 load was 3900 in those 2 other 14tw. barrels. Those slower barrels should have been similar, but they weren't.
 
Some time back, early 1990's I believe, there was an article in Precision Shooting. If memory serves, the author's last name was White. (No, I'm not gonna search for it) He and another fellow tested the effect of less body taper, ie if the Ackley thing of less case taper had any bearing on bolt pressure. They set up a device to hold a T/C barrel, just the barrel, chambered in 30-30 and fire it remotely, safely. The 30-30 case has a lot of taper. That case shot out the back. Rechambered to 30-30AI and repeated.....the case didn't come out. It was a long time ago and I don't remember if it stayed in completely or came part way out. But I do remember the results. Ackley-ized chamberings do have less back thrust than parent cases with more body taper. And top end loads work well, they like to be pushed, where the standard cartridge very often doesn't.

About velocity. Well, I've tested 3 different 223AI. All chambered by the same riflebuilder with my reamer - .250nk, 0 FB.. The good one - 25" Schneider 14tw - with 40 BT's and 2015 powder, IMI brass, 7-1/2 primer. Accuracy /working loads chrono about 4100 to nearly 4200. Same exact 4100 load was 3900 in those 2 other 14tw. barrels. Those slower barrels should have been similar, but they weren't.
PO Ackley did a similar test. He used a lever action IIRC. Been a couple decades since I read his books.
 
Some time back, early 1990's I believe, there was an article in Precision Shooting. If memory serves, the author's last name was White. (No, I'm not gonna search for it) He and another fellow tested the effect of less body taper, ie if the Ackley thing of less case taper had any bearing on bolt pressure. They set up a device to hold a T/C barrel, just the barrel, chambered in 30-30 and fire it remotely, safely. The 30-30 case has a lot of taper. That case shot out the back. Rechambered to 30-30AI and repeated.....the case didn't come out. It was a long time ago and I don't remember if it stayed in completely or came part way out. But I do remember the results. Ackley-ized chamberings do have less back thrust than parent cases with more body taper. And top end loads work well, they like to be pushed, where the standard cartridge very often doesn't.

About velocity. Well, I've tested 3 different 223AI. All chambered by the same riflebuilder with my reamer - .250nk, 0 FB.. The good one - 25" Schneider 14tw - with 40 BT's and 2015 powder, IMI brass, 7-1/2 primer. Accuracy /working loads chrono about 4100 to nearly 4200. Same exact 4100 load was 3900 in those 2 other 14tw. barrels. Those slower barrels should have been similar, but they weren't.

Dave, l remember reading one of your way, way previous posts about bbl speed differences. Something that can really mess with logical thinking when deciding powder/primer xyz does or doesn't measure up to previous results after an identical chambering.
 
Awesome! I'm still trying to figure out how/why the 20 Tactical ever got any attention instead of the 20 Sploder. I really wish someone would offer an AR barrel in this.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,326
Messages
2,193,216
Members
78,819
Latest member
DJT
Back
Top