On these better scopes I wonder why the 56mm objective instead of 60mm?
I’m hopeful to finish my 37XC this yearMyself I have an itch for a 33XC
I know of a few people running 375CT with that scope happily.I have been using the Vortex Gen 3 Razor 6-36x56 paired with the Burris XTR Signature Rings. The scope has 120moa elevation and the rings give me another 40moa. This setup has been dependable on my 338.
Regards
Rick
Was it the brass length why you opted out of the drop port?I decided against converting the Bat M Action to a drop port. Instead, I made a taller extractor to use the original Sako style extractor in the original extractor channel. I still have to cut the back side side for the little retainer pin, but the hard part is done.
I made it from a 3/8 cemented carbide shank. They are made from some type of chrome moly steel at around 38 RC. Plenty strong.
I will also have to lengthen the ejector port by about 1/4 inch to accommodate the 338 Lapua case.
I haven’t decided if I am going to order an Ace 5 port muzzle brake or just make one.View attachment 1633297View attachment 1633298
Yes.Was it the brass length why you opted out of the drop port?
Great idea for making small parts !!I decided against converting the Bat M Action to a drop port. Instead, I made a taller extractor to use the original Sako style extractor in the original extractor channel. I still have to cut the back side side for the little retainer pin, but the hard part is done.
I made it from a 3/8 cemented carbide shank. They are made from some type of chrome moly steel at around 38 RC. Plenty strong.
I will also have to lengthen the ejector port by about 1/4 inch to accommodate the 338 Lapua case.
I haven’t decided if I am going to order an Ace 5 port muzzle brake or just make one.View attachment 1633297View attachment 1633298
I lengthened the ejection port this afternoon, I made it a little longer just in case total insanity sets in and I decide to chamber a barrel in the Tubb 338 XC.
If you ever have to do any appreciable machine work on a Bat Action, you can see why these 17-4 actions are so strong. I finally dug out a carbide end mill as the HSS ones were pretty much challenged.View attachment 1633582
Are all BAT actions 17-4? I thought they were 416?I lengthened the ejection port this afternoon, I made it a little longer just in case total insanity sets in and I decide to chamber a barrel in the Tubb 338 XC.
If you ever have to do any appreciable machine work on a Bat Action, you can see why these 17-4 actions are so strong. I finally dug out a carbide end mill as the HSS ones were pretty much challenged.View attachment 1633582
One of Bat’s big selling points is they manufacture their actions from either 17-4 or Chrome Moly.Are all BAT actions 17-4? I thought they were 416?
Well there ya go! I think hall used 17-4 as well.One of Bat’s big selling points is they manufacture their actions from either 17-4 or Chrome Moly.
They also do their own in house heat treating of the 17-4. I’m not sure if they use pre hardened Chrome Moly or do their own heat treating on it as well.
The only action bodies that rival Bat’s in strength are the ones such as ARC that use 4340 and also do their own in house heat treating.
When I first read his RC hardness at 53, I thought it was a miss print.And those ARCs are hard as diamonds.
I was wondering why I could not find a retail dealer for the Tubb 5 Star and why he did not list it on his Site.A good decision to not take metal out of the bottom of that action. Hanging a heavy long barrel off of an action requires a substantial action with excellent bedding. I built a 33XC and used the Tubbs 5 Star muzzle brake. The most effective muzzle brake I have ever used however for some reason he discontinued having them made. My 33XC was 25lb and had zero muzzle rise. Those Berger 300 Hybrids are awesome projectiles. I used a 9.3 twist barrel as I had not intention to shoot heavy solids requiring more twist.