• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

NRA Elections again.

I don't think we can afford to throw away any organization that supports the Second Amendment. The NRA has had problems before and it had problems long ago but it's worth supporting.
That has been my position all along, but there have been many here that want to spew hate on the NRA and jump ship to the other, lesser known groups. There is nothing wrong with the other groups, however, they do not have the numbers and presence of the NRA. Belong to them all. We need to get the hose and bleach out during this NRA election and try to get a change for the better effected and we need to continue along this road. The NRA has the numbers. Let's go from here. I have never voted for an NRA election. I am voting right now.

Danny
 
Just FYI, I was told that if you vote for 28 folks you are wattering down your vote. If you vote for just ONE person that your vote counts for way more and that candidate gets more of a vote than if you voted for that candidate and a few others. So keep that in mind. I am Voting for Chuck Rowe.
This is just me, But anyone who was on the board in the past, during the WLP era is a huge NO GO for me. And to hear one such person tell us he had NO idea what was going on is not the right answer.
 
Just FYI, I was told that if you vote for 28 folks you are wattering down your vote. If you vote for just ONE person that your vote counts for way more and that candidate gets more of a vote than if you voted for that candidate and a few others. So keep that in mind. I am Voting for Chuck Rowe.
This is just me, But anyone who was on the board in the past, during the WLP era is a huge NO GO for me. And to hear one such person tell us he had NO idea what was going on is not the right answer.
Totally agree on the fained ignorance. Corruption at its finest.
 
OK, I did it. Didn't help as far as names of candidates, but I guess we ought to quit being lazy and do a little research. :confused: jd

I asked --
Regarding the vote for 2025 NRA Director positions, which nominees are the most likely to provide the best record and dedication to the cause of pro 2nd Amendment rights.

ChatGPT said:​


The 2025 NRA Director elections will be an important event for shaping the future of the organization, and selecting candidates who are truly dedicated to defending Second Amendment rights is crucial. While I don't have access to the current list of nominees for 2025, I can offer general advice on how to evaluate candidates and highlight traits to look for when considering which ones might have the best record and dedication to the cause:

1. Proven Track Record of Advocacy

Candidates who have consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to the Second Amendment, either through public statements, actions, or involvement in pro-gun organizations, will likely have the best track record. Look for nominees who have:
  • A history of fighting against gun control legislation.
  • Publicly supported gun rights in challenging environments (e.g., in states or regions with strong anti-gun sentiment).
  • Played an active role in grassroots efforts to educate the public about Second Amendment rights.

2. Involvement in Pro-Gun Legislation and Legal Challenges

Candidates who have been involved in legal or legislative actions supporting the Second Amendment can be key players in pushing forward NRA's mission. This might include:
  • Advocating for Constitutional carry, stand-your-ground laws, or the expansion of gun rights.
  • Supporting legal challenges to restrictive gun control measures (e.g., lawsuits to challenge bans on certain firearms or high-capacity magazines).
  • Engaging in lobbying efforts at the state or federal level.

3. Alignment with NRA's Core Mission

Not all pro-gun candidates necessarily align with the NRA's traditional stance, especially if they have alternative views on how to approach the organization’s priorities. Look for candidates who:
  • Fully support the NRA's mission to protect and expand Second Amendment rights.
  • Have a history of supporting or being involved with NRA-backed initiatives (like supporting concealed carry or gun safety programs).
  • Are aligned with the NRA’s efforts to fight against anti-gun groups and politicians.

4. Reputation for Integrity and Accountability

Integrity is key in any position of leadership, particularly in organizations that represent millions of members. Candidates who:
  • Are known for their transparency and honesty in both professional and personal endeavors.
  • Have avoided controversy or scandals, especially ones that might undermine the NRA’s mission.
  • Are accountable for their actions and decisions, with a focus on the greater good of advancing gun rights.

5. Leadership and Organizational Experience

A strong candidate will have experience not only as an advocate but also as an effective leader within the NRA or other similar organizations. Look for nominees who:
  • Have served in leadership roles within the NRA, gun rights groups, or related industries.
  • Demonstrate a commitment to improving the NRA's ability to organize, fundraise, and influence public policy.
  • Show the capacity to unite members around key initiatives and keep the focus on advancing Second Amendment rights.

6. Support for Grassroots Involvement

Candidates who encourage grassroots involvement and community-building around the Second Amendment tend to align with the values that drive the NRA. Look for nominees who:
  • Prioritize outreach and mobilization efforts to engage new members and young people in the cause.
  • Support educational programs about firearms, safety, and self-defense.
  • Have worked to build strong networks of activists who can advocate for the Second Amendment on a local level.

7. Endorsements and Support

Finally, looking at who supports or endorses a candidate can also provide insight into their commitment to gun rights. Consider:
  • Candidates who are endorsed by prominent pro-gun groups or figures within the Second Amendment community.
  • Individuals with support from NRA members who have a reputation for being highly engaged in pro-gun advocacy.
Since the candidates for the 2025 board are likely to be announced closer to the election, I would recommend keeping an eye on NRA publications, official communications, or websites that track the process for any public endorsements or detailed platforms. It’s also helpful to attend NRA events or listen to interviews with nominees to gauge their sincerity and approach to Second Amendment advocacy.
If you’re familiar with specific names that are running for the 2025 board or have any that you’re considering, I can help dive into their backgrounds and positions based on available information.

"Not a liar".

I'd start there.

Good luck.
 
As I've stated before I was a life member for many years, I don't remember when I quit, so I have no vote. Watch what they do not what they say. This is why you can't trust money and loyalty. New board members must show they are interested in by-law changes so what happened can not happen again. But until the membership has more in-put I will not rejoin. WLP and his enablers belong in jail!!! Also the lobbyist for the NRA can not continue to be 'yellers and screamers' and insulters like WLP and Harlon Carter. Knowing how to discuss and argue with out appearing a nut case opens doors. Listening is more important than crazy conversation, you learn what to argue against and how to make your point. We need reasonable, knowledgeable and trained people for advisor to the people writing legislation. It must be pointed out that most legislation only inconveniences the legal, responsible and safe gun user/owner. Character and Competence
 
  • Like
Reactions: MQ1
Not on my radar any longer since I stopped supporting them a while back, but I respect this guy's thoughts.


Also I believe Jeff Knox (Neal's son) writes at Ammoland. Another voice of reason.

Just found this...

 
Was looking at my ballet again and thought I would check this thread for recommendations. Are there any recomendations?
 
Just a question with zero strings.
If one is a “Life Member “, how do you quit, short of death?
I just sent them a letter stating why I was resigning, never got a reply, but the magazine was stopped. I had not heard from them for many years, they didn't send anything asking for "donations to WLP". The NRA had the annual meeting in Seattle, I don't remember the year. I spoke with a NRA employee from Vancouver, WA. he was involved with the targeting shooting. I commented that we needed to get more legislative Democrats involved, to stop the arguments and legislation. His comment was "but they're so liberal on everything else". He had no idea on how to be successful. I have lobbied and testified for legislation. That is when I quit donating. I think I resigned in the early 1990s. When an NRA finance person went to the Rocky Mtn. Elk Foundation as its leader, I quickly resigned from that organization also. NRA employees and Board members had to know of the theft and poor money management. I am 'gun shy' about belonging to any organization. "Fool me once whoops, fool me twice my fault"
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,832
Messages
2,203,939
Members
79,144
Latest member
BCB1
Back
Top