Military usage, supposedly.What's going on with alliant powders?
Military usage, supposedly.What's going on with alliant powders?
+1 kinda wondering what's meant. RL16 both 1 & 8 in-stock, just albeit pricey.What's going on with alliant powders?
Thank you Sir for the response, I was thinking they were not going to sell it to the hand loading consumers or just to certain ammo producers.Military usage, supposedly.
RL 16 is available online@Matt_3479,
Take the RL16 results with a grain of salt.
We don't know when or if we'll see Alliant powders again.
At $65.23 per pound!RL 16 is available online
Shop Rifle & Shotgun Reloading Supplies | Dies | Bullets | Hulls | Wads | Powder - Precision Reloading
Shop online for shotshell and metallic reloading supplies, shooting supplies, metallic presses, rifle reloading components, shotshell reloading components, shooting accessories, rifle reloading brass and Bullets.www.precisionreloading.com
View attachment 1606989
Ammunition & Reloading Supplies - Rifle, Handgun, & Shotgun
www.milehighshooting.com
View attachment 1606990
Unfortunately I don’t have any. My focus will be the 135’s, but I am hoping to try the 133’s at some point. My goal is powders first to learn the caliber a bit.Have you tried the 133's?
Well techically it doesn’t matter, but I was told it’s better to neck down then size up if possible. So bushing die down, or mandrel up. It’s 1 motion either way.Which was is easier to get to a 25x47, from a 6x47 or 6.5x47? I've been thinking making a 25GT or a 25x47 for silhouette
That makes sense, thank you and thank you matt_3479Always heard the same. Down was better than up. Further support. .243 to .257 is up .014. AND .264 down to .257 is only .007. Half the movement.
Dang, great shooting.Well I managed to get out and shoot some ladders with bergers today, rl16 and n150. N150 just isn’t impressing me to much with ladders yet the numbers look good. I picked a couple nodes I thought were there for each powder and went back to test them. The n150 slightly disappointed and might give it one more go before putting it back on the shelf. Im going to explore varget while I reexplore n150.
Rl16 on the other hand had a clear node. The numbers weren’t the best I’ve had and seem to be bouncing a little bit between 5-10sd’s but the groups and poi’s are consistent. I fired 6 3 shot groups at 102 yards that had an average of .177 moa, then a few at 600 to just confirm.
View attachment 1607408View attachment 1607409View attachment 1607410View attachment 1607411View attachment 1607412View attachment 1607413
Thank you!Dang, great shooting.
I never actually finished load work with either varget or n150. Both powders showed excellent potential in numbers but ladder tests didn’t look as tight on paper. I’d like to revisit both n150 and varget as I know I’ll be able to get them to shoot as I still had great results overall.What's your ballpark load with N150? I tried it and pressured out just a little slower than using Varget. I was using R16 at 39.5 with BR4 primers for 2880 and it was a hammer but didn't like any other primer. With 40.4 of N160 it's doing only 2800 but 3 back to back 5 shot groups averaged just under .35" The N160 has been very consistent and consistently good. All loads are using the Berger 135 .005" off the lands and a 28" barrel.
I presume necking down has more brass material to work with, which someone in this thread pointed out. If I get an extra 2 hours in the next week or so, I may dig up some 243 and 6.5x47 and compare. Has anyone weighed virgin Lap 243/6.5x47 and compared. I guess the 6.5 would naturally have more mass?Always heard the same. Down was better than up. Further support. .243 to .257 is up .014. AND .264 down to .257 is only .007. Half the movement.