TRSR8
Silver $$ Contributor
Waxed Lead Messiah aka Bill CalfeeI’ve seen WLM mentioned a few times in different posts, tried searching and can’t seem to find anything. What does WLM stand for?
Waxed Lead Messiah aka Bill CalfeeI’ve seen WLM mentioned a few times in different posts, tried searching and can’t seem to find anything. What does WLM stand for?
@TRSR8 I just read a few posts from Bill he obviously disagrees with Kolbes theories About positive compensation. Do you agree with Bill Calfee?Waxed Lead Messiah aka Bill Calfee
I Google him and got links to his book and a forum he seems to actively participate inty @TRSR8 Anyone have a link or know to find the channel? Every search Ive done brings you to a book. His name doesn't bring much in the google search either.
Not sure I'd go down this avenue. At least not until you have a lot of time and patience haha@TRSR8 I just read a few posts from Bill he obviously disagrees with Kolbes theories About positive compensation. Do you agree with Bill Calfee?
Fair enough. Lol. From the few posts I read Bill brings up a few valid points. Kolbe even acknowledges more research has to be done.Not sure I'd go down this avenue. At least not until you have a lot of time and patience haha
only one way to find outJim, if the test at the different tuner settings from 372 to 390 was repeated several times with the same ammo would the results be similar each time?
This is why poi is critical and why a single group means nearly nothing without the others being predicatable in shape. I would not depend on that setting.Your 10 shots at 388 make a nice little sine wave without moving the tuner, sweet.
checked the target with my overlay, 8 of 10 would have been solid100's, and the 2 that were maybes would need to be plugged. As a newbie in Unlimited I would take that any day of the week in a matchYour 10 shots at 388 make a nice little sine wave without moving the tuner, sweet.
Me either, especially with "perfect conditions".This is why poi is critical and why a single group means nearly nothing without the others being predicatable in shape. I would not depend on that setting.
Could be the ammo but I don't think so. He said perfect conditions so I believe him but it looks a lot like wind or something changing, to me. Nothing in that test appears to show the top side of the bbl swing. It's about half of the test. My test is 15 five shot groups, moving MY tuner two marks at a time. His previous test looked to me like he should move in 3 mark intervals with his gun/tuner. So I'm confused as to why he did this, this way after our discussion here. Not telling anybody what to do what tryining to explain what I look for and why. To see those things requires the test to be done a specific way and for enough groups to cover a full nodal cycle. I can help more with my test than I can by someone else's, fired in some other fashion. Sorry Jim but that's simply not my test. Still happy to try to help buddy but every single group of my test tells me something and is needed. Sometimes, a couple more groups, particularly so if your test starts out at a setting that appears to be in or nearly in tune. It's much simpler than this sounds but it's hard to type every little detail on a forum. Two things...that's why my test is 15 groups and why I do all this by phone...But I'm trying to do my part here, even with a different tuner. All I ask is the test be my EXACT test...zero deviations. Every single thing matters. I think with your tuner, I'd fire 15 five shot groups, starting at 365ish, and move it 3 marks at a time with your tuner/rifle...based on what I've seen so far.Me either, especially with "perfect conditions".
It has an up and to the right diagonal shape too. That's a pretty tell tail sign to me, along with poi. Pretty far off, imho. Eith that, the ammo doesn't shoot in that bbl or something is moving...maybe wind but he said conditions were perfect. It's so predictable that I've found bad bedding over the phone based on my test targets. Not saying that's what's up here but more to haow predictable the shapes are.We call this kind of shooting "wallowing". Yes you shoot a decent score but you have a very low X count.
We call this kind of shooting "wallowing". Yes you shoot a decent score but you have a very low X count.
It has an up and to the right diagonal shape too. That's a pretty tell tail sign to me, along with poi. Pretty far off, imho. Eith that, the ammo doesn't shoot in that bbl or something is moving...maybe wind but he said conditions were perfect. It's so predictable that I've found bad bedding over the phone based on my test targets. Not saying that's what's up here but
more to haow predictable the shapes are.
I'm really just being brutally honest and no intentions to seem rude in the least. Give me a call tomorrow and lets make sure we get on the same page before you waste any more time or ammo. You know I'm always happy to talk tuners! Lol! I mean that!@gunsandgunsmithing
interesting, next half decent day we get I will do the 5 shot 15 group test
that's exactly what I normally do on my typical score, decent scores, low X counts, plugged 50's