• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Major Factor in Primer Seating Depth Variability

Why not get a little deeper into this rabbit hole and uniform primer pockets since you're going thru all the trouble measuring and eliminating cases that are out of spec, it might make your primer seating depth more consistent, It's a simple task and you do it only once, 21st Century adjustable tool makes it easy and you can clean primer pockets using the same tool if you'd like.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you use a primer pocket uniformer, shouldn't the depth
be all the same since it's indexing off the base of the case?
And if you use a primer seater that has a stop, shouldn't the primers all be seated
the same depth? ( other than the difference of the primer height, which isn't going to vary more than .001 )
 
If you eliminate the case from lifting, then primer depth should be consistent.
As far as I know, all priming systems hold cases by their rims.
If the rims are different thickness, then cases will be held in different positions during seating.

To seat to same preload:
The total primer height has to be accounted for.
The rim thickness has to be accounted for.
The pocket depth has to be accounted for.
All at once.
This is not averages or generalizations. You either set same preload or you don't.
 
If you watch the video, the Lee ACP doesn't use a shell holder and
won't have the difference in rim thickness as a problem.
If you use the Lee and a primer pocket uniformer, would seem to
fix most of the problems with slack or different primer pocket depths,
since both are indexing off the base of the case and not the rim. ( thickness )
 
As far as I know, all priming systems hold cases by their rims.
If the rims are different thickness, then cases will be held in different positions during seating.

To seat to same preload:
The total primer height has to be accounted for.
The rim thickness has to be accounted for.
The pocket depth has to be accounted for.
All at once.
This is not averages or generalizations. You either set same preload or you don't.
That's what's great about the Lee Acp...It doesn't use a shell holder, it holds it down from inside the case with a plunger type thing. It goes in through the neck and presses the case down.
 
Well then you have web thickness variance,, likely worse than rim variance..
Not even close to being worse than rim variances. I use the Lee Acp and my results are very similar to the OP's. My primers are always within .0005 variance.

I have a forster bench primer that uses a shell holder and it can vary by as much as .003, even with a hard stop.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,309
Messages
2,215,915
Members
79,519
Latest member
DW79
Back
Top