There are no striking standards that I'm aware of
There are only very loose engineering design guidelines for ignition with respect to pin protuberance and firing pin impact energy.
TLDR: if you bother to carefully assemble your ammo, don't neglect your firing pin and bolt.
The commercial primer sales generally follow the science/engineering of the MIL world, but only those primers you tend to see with names like 34 or 41 are bound by the external specs. Commercial (SAAMI) primers may or may not since they may not be concerned with slam fire or mil spec temperature requirements. Commercial outfits have not advertised their primer stats in my memory.
Some of the primer sensitivity tests are organized around a dropped mass that hits a standardized firing pin which rests in special tooling above the primer in the test rig. The falling weight will have a settable height, which determines the energy of the impact. For slam fire requirements, primers are not supposed to go off below a certain maximum setting, and then they must go off above a minimum higher one. Sounds simple in theory doesn't it....
In those machines, one can "play" with the firing pin shapes and protuberance and study the primer ignition statistics (and performance).
To mikecr's point, making the jump in relationship between the design guidelines for primers versus what the actual cartridges, tooling, and guns do is another matter all together.
If there was a failure to ignite, or a performance problem for example, investigating the actual protuberance and energy level of the firing pin's strike isn't trivial for the design or the actual gun/ammo. Topics like springs, friction, damping, etc., are all somewhat chaotic when it comes down to business.
Just like the dimensions of the brass cartridge + the primers + primer tooling... present us with a tolerance study that results in a potential spread of seating results... now imagine the study of the tolerances for things like firing pin assemblies, bolts and chambers that all add to that ignition discussion before we can sit down to estimate the high-low ignition values for a design review, and then go into a lab to determine how actual hardware samples turned out.
Getting grunts to maintain their firing pin assemblies according to procedures is like herding cats. Letting them get dirty or contaminating the lube is difficult to account for in a design review or investigation to say the least, and then there is the fit of the ammo to the chamber that also plays a role and this is also where contaminated chambers are difficult to estimate.
If you are getting picky, keep in mind your brass prep (headspace tolerance) also figures into this ignition equation, and there are differences in ejectors and extractors that must be accounted for and maintained. Don't neglect your firing pin and bolt. Be careful not to over/under lubricate your hardware and pay attention after weather or dusty days. There is no point to being careful with primer seating and then being sloppy with everything else. YMMV
