• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Theoretically perfect receiver?

So, in bolt action receivers, there are basically 2 forms.
One with front locking lugs.
And one with rear locking lugs.
Either way, one end of the bolt is left "free hanging".

Would a bolt that locked at both the front and the rear be possible?
My line of thinking, is it would provide more support than allowing one end of the bolt unsupported.

Thoughts?
 
So, in bolt action receivers, there are basically 2 forms.
One with front locking lugs.
And one with rear locking lugs.
Either way, one end of the bolt is left "free hanging".

Would a bolt that locked at both the front and the rear be possible?
My line of thinking, is it would provide more support than allowing one end of the bolt unsupported.

Thoughts?
Dave is on the right track .. Tommy Mc
 
I understand 3 lug actions are not preferred over 2 lug.
Would this reasoning not be the same with an extra lug no matter where ?

Idk I've never had one.
 
I understand 3 lug actions are not preferred over 2 lug.
Would this reasoning not be the same with an extra lug no matter where ?

Idk I've never had one.
When Bat came out with their 3-lug, every body marveled at it. Short bolt throw meant quicker loading, faster shooting.

except the old law of physics and diminishing returns stepped in. Less bolt travel meant less mechanical advantage. Stiffer bolt with upper end loads.

I remember top shooters at a particular Nationals grimacing when their customary high pressure loads were resulting in darned near jerking the rifle out of the bags as they tried to run a condition.

Great idea on paper.
 
Everything is a compromise. Be careful what you wish for. It might not be what you expected. I have an old BAT with a screw in firing pin assembly. You've heard " From my cold dead hands"
I think the world of Bruce and the greatworkmanship they put into their product…….

But they should never have abandoned the screw in shroud.
 
I think what you are after is a Borden Action. It is a front lug action and Jim has come up with the Borden Bump. This is a ring area on the bolt that is closer to the inside diameter of the action and this supports the bolt at the rear of the bolt or action.
Many accurized Remington 700 rifles had the bolt "bushed" to do the same thing 30 or so years ago.It was pretty common
 
Why does no one ever bring Weatherby into this kind of discussion?
The whole concept of the Weatherby Mark 5 was strength to handle the Weatherby chamberings. The nine locking lug arrangement gave a much shorter bolt throw as well.

That being said, has it ever been proved if nine tiny locking lugs were actually any stronger than two large ones?
 
The whole concept of the Weatherby Mark 5 was strength to handle the Weatherby chamberings. The nine locking lug arrangement gave a much shorter bolt throw as well.

That being said, has it ever been proved if nine tiny locking lugs were actually any stronger than two large ones?
Years ago I read an article regarding this very subject. Most of it was way over my head but yes, the nine small lugs are stronger. The article made an analogy involving machine screws with fine threads being stronger than coarse threads even though the course threads are “larger”.

And there ya had it. A successfully derailed thread.
 
I think what you are after is a Borden Action. It is a front lug action and Jim has come up with the Borden Bump. This is a ring area on the bolt that is closer to the inside diameter of the action and this supports the bolt at the rear of the bolt or action.
Yes , I did the so called Borden bumps, on a 700 Remington. Bore the bolt raceway, I added titanium bushings, turned them down for a slip fit then relieved the bushings on the non lock sides of the bolt on fore and aft bushings. It works great, absolutely no movement on a dial indicator when the trued bolt and reciever are in locked position. The gun was accurate. Anymore accurate than not doing it? I don't know, my marksmanship probably not good enough to tell. I haven't done it since, but I can when ever I want. I get satisfactory accuracy for me by not boring the reciever raceway, and bushing the bolt. For those who don't want to bush the bolt but want the same can bore the raceway and order the 700 bolt with the correct diameter from pacific tool and gauge.
I would not do it on a combat or hunting gun, as there is almost no clearance between the bolt diameter and the raceway diameter...a little debris dirt might be a problem...a hair that falls out of your beard might lock up your bolt...on a hunt of a lifetime...or worse. But its fine for you target types, a little more time consuming so the price will go up...but it's not hard to do. Worth it... hell if I know, but I got a super tight action when the lugs are in the lock position.
 
I think the closest to the perfect receiver that I ever used was the Wichita Mini action. Short bolt with the bearing point of the three locking lugs being near the middle of the bolt. No port or cut out. Shell holder bolt. Rigid and concentric.
By the way, I think it was established that the Weatherby nine-lug system produced more contact area than the Remington 700 but less shear strength. WH
 
American Rifle Company uses toroidal lugs(three and two lug, interchangeable for size) and the rear of the bolt has an alignment ring. They are not benchrest actions but field and competition(PRS) actions. They function and shoot really well.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,778
Messages
2,184,166
Members
78,507
Latest member
Rabbit hole
Back
Top