Gun is an all-factory bedded Kimber Montana in .223 Rem shooting Berger FBT 55gn bullets over 26.4gn of AA2230 at 3400fps average velocity. These were shot off a bench with a front rest/bag and a rear bag. 2 foulers were shot from a clean barrel before the groups. 1 minute between shots, 20 minutes between the two groups. Close to zero wind.
I know MOA size can be expected to open up some as the range increase, but 5x from going from 100yds to 200yds is ridiculous.
Are you annealing?"When you seat your bullets are they feeling the same from bullet to bullet when they go in the brass? Neck Tension equal?"
I've wondered whether my neck tension is under control. I seat using a Wilson inline die and a 21st Century arbor press. No hydro measuring capabilities, though. Neck tension does sometimes feel different. In fact, sometimes I have to neck-size a particular case down another .001" to keep the bullet from "falling in." This is why I am switching from the Starline brass to Lapua brass.
I have the capability to trim necks, but such level of case prep seems a little over-the-top for a 200yd prairie dog gun.
Neck tension does sometimes feel different. In fact, sometimes I have to neck-size a particular case down another .001" to keep the bullet from "falling in."
It's not the bullet's. It's the powder, it's always the powder.I would be looking for a different or better bullet
It's the powder, it's always the powder. 1"+ groups are rotten. My 223 Tikka rifle's make between high zeros to 1/4" . 300 yard groups under 1" mostly with varget powder. I could show you groups of 1" at 100 yards with those same rifle's only using the wrong powder. It's always the powder that makes the accuracy difference.Gun is an all-factory bedded Kimber Montana in .223 Rem shooting Berger FBT 55gn bullets over 26.4gn of AA2230 at 3400fps average velocity. These were shot off a bench with a front rest/bag and a rear bag. 2 foulers were shot from a clean barrel before the groups. 1 minute between shots, 20 minutes between the two groups. Close to zero wind.
I know MOA size can be expected to open up some as the range increase, but 5x from going from 100yds to 200yds is ridiculous.
The ES isn't great, but it isn't enough to blow up a group that much at 200yds . . . ?
At 100yds, group size is 1.15", ES = 104fps:
At 200yds, group size is 5.37", ES=120fps:
Had almost similar results with a Ruger Hawkeye in .223 Rem at the same shooting session.
At 100yds, group size is 1.05", ES=100fps:
At 200yds, group size is 3.66", ES=144fps:
![]()
I have considered getting a dedicated fixed-power target scope. But, I am usually working up loads for multiple rifles at one time, so just one target scope wouldn't be enough. My wallet is already crying as it is.
I picked up in a trade a Swarovski Z5 3.5-18x44, with the BRX fine crosshairs reticle. I'll see if I can "limp" along with that optic for load development for awhile.
i am no stranger to limping along when it comes to optics. it's the $$$. when i have to work with hunting optics i use a 'reverse' target so to speak. i print them up with the white space sized according to reticle subtension, and use them like iron dual peep sights so to speak, centering up the white space.I'll see if I can "limp" along with that optic

PS... hey Shinbone, PM me with your mailing address; I’ll send you some samples to try.
