Hi Ben.
Thanks for your input..
I've been wondering why folk have been favouring the 300wsm and it's because they hold elevations better then..
I've got all the ballistics entered into my bal cal and it tells me that my 184gr hybrids shoots inside the 215gr hybrids...
According to my bal cal the 180gr ELDM's are by far the best wind bucker but unfortunately I had some blank targets from possible blowups..
Standing the 183gr smks,184gr hybrid,180gr ELDM and a 180gr scenar l side by side the figures don't follow our perception on how the bullets look....
The scenars are the least aerodynamic looking which does figure in the Bc's numbers..
Of the 3 others you'd expect the ELDM's to be 3rd over the other 2 other really sleek looking bullets...
Are hornady BC figures correct..??
Thanks for your input..
I've been wondering why folk have been favouring the 300wsm and it's because they hold elevations better then..
I've got all the ballistics entered into my bal cal and it tells me that my 184gr hybrids shoots inside the 215gr hybrids...
According to my bal cal the 180gr ELDM's are by far the best wind bucker but unfortunately I had some blank targets from possible blowups..
Standing the 183gr smks,184gr hybrid,180gr ELDM and a 180gr scenar l side by side the figures don't follow our perception on how the bullets look....
The scenars are the least aerodynamic looking which does figure in the Bc's numbers..
Of the 3 others you'd expect the ELDM's to be 3rd over the other 2 other really sleek looking bullets...
Are hornady BC figures correct..??
Last edited: