Hmm,, I did not know this information has been declassified yet but here we go: Yes this is true. The 6.5 Creedmoor will be used, a round(only 1 is needed)will be fired from one of several satellites, then will be redirected via ricochet from one of the many Space Hovering Intergalactic Targeting (SHIT) satellites. From there it can be fine tuned by re-redirection from one of the Final Attitude Node (FAN) satellites, from there it will be on its way to the one shot kill and subsequent youtube video with a bazillion likes.I hear that Trump’s new “Space Force” will be give the CREED! as standard issue due to its intergalactic range and alien killing potential
Sure wish the.260 would have been half as popular as the 6.5 Creedmoor. Oh well.....
Oh sure, using a mirror to aim, thats like cheating(BTW, did I ever tell you about the time I hit a 3-inch diameter gong at 2,000 yards with the Creedmoor, first shot no sighters, moreover shooting backwards over my shoulder using a mirror to aim the rifle? Since it would have been too easy in daylight, it was done on a moonless night too!)
(BTW, did I ever tell you about the time I hit a 3-inch diameter gong at 2,000 yards with the Creedmoor, first shot no sighters, moreover shooting backwards over my shoulder using a mirror to aim the rifle? Since it would have been too easy in daylight, it was done on a moonless night too!)
Oh sure, using a mirror to aim, thats like cheating![]()
I made the same shot with a CREED! but riding horseback, upside down, from underneath the horse, cossack style.
(BTW, did I ever tell you about the time I hit a 3-inch diameter gong at 2,000 yards with the Creedmoor, first shot no sighters, moreover shooting backwards over my shoulder using a mirror to aim the rifle? Since it would have been too easy in daylight, it was done on a moonless night too!)
Blame Remington. They haven't EVER successfully released and supported a cartridge despite having the superior design every time. The 244 then 6mm Remington, the 280 then 7mm express, the RSAUMs, and the 260 are great examples of exemplary cartridges that were horribly mistreated, neglected, and then ultimately abandoned. Then Hornady comes along and does everything right, resulting in the Creedmoor actually succeeding and everyone gets their panties in a bunch.Sure wish the.260 would have been half as popular as the 6.5 Creedmoor. Oh well.....
Blame Remington. They haven't EVER successfully released and supported a cartridge despite having the superior design every time. The 244 then 6mm Remington, the 280 then 7mm express, the RSAUMs, and the 260 are great examples of exemplary cartridges that were horribly mistreated, neglected, and then ultimately abandoned. Then Hornady comes along and does everything right, resulting in the Creedmoor actually succeeding and everyone gets their panties in a bunch.
Having worked for their parent, in my opinion one of the most risk averse companies on the planet, they had good cartridges but the suits, MBAs from the parent company who didn't know sheepshit from shinola about the gun business, held the purse strings.Blame Remington. They haven't EVER successfully released and supported a cartridge despite having the superior design every time. The 244 then 6mm Remington, the 280 then 7mm express, the RSAUMs, and the 260 are great examples of exemplary cartridges that were horribly mistreated, neglected, and then ultimately abandoned. Then Hornady comes along and does everything right, resulting in the Creedmoor actually succeeding and everyone gets their panties in a bunch.
I remember some of our best shots in the Marine corp were recruits that had never picked up a rifle in there life but paid close attention in class and on the rangeGreat points. I have had the opportunity to teach a lot of young folks gun safety and how to shoot better and responsible in the field. I have had a tough time teaching some of the young men but have never had trouble teach young ladies. They are better at picking it up. Probably lots of reasons why.
I remember 12 or 15 years ago a young couple coming out to the house to work on there shooting. They were in their early 20s. He had hunted since he was a kid. She had never hunted or shot a rifle but wanted to learn. He would have nothing to do with any pointers or advice. She on the other hand soaked it up like a sponge and within an hour or so and a box or so of ammo....well she was shooting circles around him.
There are no magic rounds calibers or guns. Place a projectile with enough energy that is capable of damaging vitals that’s the magic. Some combination make that easier for sure.
were you standing on two basketballs or just one....lolIt could and would have been if Remington had put any effort into supporting it in recent years instead of developing new numbers that all flopped. AFAIK, Remington doesn't do a single match or tactical factory loading and never has. Where was Big Green looking, and what was it looking at, when 260 and 260AI were the cartridges for Sniper and other tactical disciplines? It's scandalous that small operators like Applied Ballistics, HSM, and Prime Ammo can make money out of match/tactical loads in the cartridge, but the company whose name it bears couldn't even be bothered making brass for it during the recent components shortages and drove the last of its supporters away.
Remington could have easily have developed and produced an enhanced longer neck, 30-deg shoulder model like Robert Whitley's 6.5SLR (and Winchester too for that matter with the 243 Win).
Hornady / Savage / Ruger etc have put the time, money and effort into the Creedmoors. Carry on like this and in a generation or so there will be no Remington or Winchester given their inertia and poor judgments of recent years.
(BTW, did I ever tell you about the time I hit a 3-inch diameter gong at 2,000 yards with the Creedmoor, first shot no sighters, moreover shooting backwards over my shoulder using a mirror to aim the rifle? Since it would have been too easy in daylight, it was done on a moonless night too!)