I'm planning a back country mule deer hunt this fall. I'll take two rifles just in case of the unlikely event one should fail. One rifle sports a NF NXS 5.5-22X56. I absolutely love the scope but it is Heavy! Been looking at Leupold's VX6 HD series. I've only looked through them inside of a big store, but I was impressed with the clarity. I'm a dial up guy and am not fully on board with the turrets. My first concern is how small and close together the lines are. I'm older and my distance vision is still great, but I need reading glasses for the small stuff. My NF has low speed turrets, big lines with adequate spacing. So with it, I have no need for glasses while hunting. My other concern with the turrets is that the clicks feel a little soft, at least compared to my NXS. For a big game hunting scope I'm thinking maybe I could get by with something like the B&C reticle and not "dial up"? I don't have any experience with the Leupold custom dials that can be installed. Perhaps they are easily readable and would solve the turret issue for me? I'm really fussy about reticles and detest those that completely fill my sight picture. I have 3 illuminated LRV reticles in Leupold VX6 Scopes and like these. They are essentially 3 dots. Simple and effective, but not available with the VX HD series. Help me out here guys!
A couple years back, after squirrel shooting I had the chance to shoot a coyote to help my rancher friend out. It was a hurry-up opportunity, as we had already packed the truck, and inside a 15 seconds I had the rifle out and I was prone. I had dialed the scope back off about 30x, because I could not find the coyote, and once I got a good field of view I asked my partner to range me. The coyote was exactly 500 yards away, and I dialed my yardage, settled and shot.
One dead coyote later, and after we drove across two valleys in the evening sun to confirm the kill, I realized that I had killed the coyote with the 8-32 Burris Black Diamond scope set to 8 power. I vividly recalled that the coyote seemed big in my sight picture, and I was not in the least under-scoped. It was an important lesson to be learned...for any reasonable hunting shots, high magnifaction is not as necessary as understanding my equipment and my dope. A bonus was that I spotted the hit (I was shooting a 243AI with a 80gr Nosler Ballstic Tip...the rifle with glass weighed 13.5 lbs).
IMHO, you can lighten up your hunting rig by getting off the 56mm objective and get something more convienant for the hunting purpose...32-40mm objective in 3-9 or 3-10 power scope is all a marksman will really need for a back country hunt.
After dedicating my high power scopes to my varmint / target rifles, I have been exceedingly happy with the performance of my 3-9 Burris and Leupold scopes for coyote and big game hunting.
IMHO, if you want the best chance of success on your hunt, put a high quality 3-9x Leupold Firedot scope (with CDS) on your rifle. Sight it in to the MPBR that best fits your chosen caliber and then either get a CDS dial that matches your trajectory, or build your own dope card with your dial ups to match your known furthest distance you are capable of, and shoot no animal further than that distance. I have 1 Firedot, but it is a 2-7 on my .270 Winchester. My .270WSM and 25-06 both have older Burris Electro-Dots in 3-9....I wish they still made that scope!
If you like Nightforce glass and have the cash, look at their 2-10 (32mm Objective) scopes. They are tank heavy, but stout like a Nightforce. Again, sight in at your MPBR, know your dial ups from there, and you are stacking the odds of a successful hunt in your favor.
Chances are, you find your quarry 180-225 yards away...or 50 yards away...and you aim quickly with no dialing and place your shot in the boiler-room for a clean kill. You may only have 15 seconds to get that shot off, and if you are only relying on dialing your yardage you stand a good chance to miss your shooting opportunity before you get set and dialed in.
Lastly, get the illuminated reticle option...you are more likely to need that than higher magnification, IMHO.
MQ1