The working load happens to be 24.5 of H4895.. but i am going to do a seating dept test next..Ok.. did that ladder today..
View attachment 1027007
Shot at 200 yards.. it was too dark to shoot at 300.. Point of aim was the right eye!
70 gr RDF
H4895 powder
65K off the lands.
Ok.. did that ladder today..
View attachment 1027007
Shot at 200 yards.. it was too dark to shoot at 300.. Point of aim was the right eye!
70 gr RDF
H4895 powder
65K off the lands.
Well it tells me where the nodes are and were the pressure starts.. i do the ladder before i do OCW.. that way, i can concentrate on the nodal zone. No reason to shoot 3 shot groups from the git go trying to find that node and pressure.. i usually only use no more than a total of 30 bullets to find that working load..What does shooting just 1 round of each charge tell you?
In my experience, the RDFs like to be seated some distance from the lands. I'm not sure how you've loaded them, but try jumping the 6.5 140s between .020" and .040". I've had very consistent and perfectly acceptable results with the 6.5, 6mm and .224 RDFs; I have not yet tried the .308s, but I'm going to soon. They're not Bergers in terms of performance but the price screams 'Try me!'. I use them to bang steel and for local matches but I wouldn't feel severely handicapped with the 6.5s under any circumstances. My .260 AI barrels like them just fine.Anybody else having issues getting these things to shoot consistently? I'm having a hell of a hard time getting the 140 RDF's to shoot consistent groups out of a 1:8 twist 6.5 creedmoor.
It'll stack bullets in the same hole for a few rounds, and then all of a sudden produce 1-2 fliers in that same group. My rifles love 140 AMAX's, perhaps this isn't the bullet for my current rifle.
In the mean time, I am swapping to Berger 140 hybrids. Initial load testing looks more promising with the Bergers.
In my experience, the RDFs like to be seated some distance from the lands. I'm not sure how you've loaded them, but try jumping the 6.5 140s between .020" and .040". I've had very consistent and perfectly acceptable results with the 6.5, 6mm and .224 RDFs; I have not yet tried the .308s, but I'm going to soon. They're not Bergers in terms of performance but the price screams 'Try me!'. I use them to bang steel and for local matches but I wouldn't feel severely handicapped with the 6.5s under any circumstances. My .260 AI barrels like them just fine.
Anybody else having issues getting these things to shoot consistently? I'm having a hell of a hard time getting the 140 RDF's to shoot consistent groups out of a 1:8 twist 6.5 creedmoor.
It'll stack bullets in the same hole for a few rounds, and then all of a sudden produce 1-2 fliers in that same group. My rifles love 140 AMAX's, perhaps this isn't the bullet for my current rifle.
In the mean time, I am swapping to Berger 140 hybrids. Initial load testing looks more promising with the Bergers.
I got the same results as you.
I did a lot of very careful testing with the RDF's and although they look real sexy and are priced right, I couldn't get them to shoot with the consistency of the Berger 140 Hybrids out of my 6.5 Creedmoor. For now I'll be sticking with Berger for F-class competition at 600 yards.
To clarify, did all who had accuracy problems use blemished (factory seconds) bullets? I know blemished bullets are only supposed to be appearance, but if your box is from different dies or lots that would explain the flyers.