Alex Wheeler
Site $$ Sponsor
Not using your br2 anymore?
Yes Alex I still use my G7 a lot but sometimes depending on what gun I'm packing and how far I'm walking I don't always pack it because of its size when I already have big bino's hanging off my neck. I like the pocket size for carry, but most of the time I have both of them on me. In low light I like the Leica reticule better than the G7.Not using your br2 anymore?
Has anybody used there sig kilo when it’s colder out like below 31? I had issues with mine today it was in the mid teens and wouldn’t range a big bush that I know was under 1000 yards. Sig told me the cold will affect them the battery gets to cold and they won’t work right then below 31.
I hear the same thing but it seems to be on a 50-50 basis. Either they seem to work great or hardly at all. I hope they get it worked out. MattI just purchased the Sig 2400 with all the bells and whistles. So far so good. Farthest reading so far has been about 2750 yds. I tried my buddies 2400 in the field before the purchase. We are both very happy with the 2400. Maybe we are both lucky as well, based on all the problems people seem to be having. I had mine out yesterday in 15 deg weather and no problems so far. Very glad it has the full warranty, including electronics, for 5 yrs. My stuff gets used weekly in the field hiking with my dogs. If anyone can wear it out or break it I will be the one. Lol.I will keep you guys posted if anything goes up in smoke.
Paul
www.proprecisionrifles.com
I just purchased the Sig 2400 with all the bells and whistles. So far so good. Farthest reading so far has been about 2750 yds. I tried my buddies 2400 in the field before the purchase. We are both very happy with the 2400. Maybe we are both lucky as well, based on all the problems people seem to be having. I had mine out yesterday in 15 deg weather and no problems so far. Very glad it has the full warranty, including electronics, for 5 yrs. My stuff gets used weekly in the field hiking with my dogs. If anyone can wear it out or break it I will be the one. Lol.I will keep you guys posted if anything goes up in smoke.
Paul
www.proprecisionrifles.com
Like you I was reading along and was shocked at the disdain for the Sig Kilo vs the Leica. I am about 15 years behind the curve on Rangefinders as my last two are the Leica Geovid and 1600LRF. They have been keeping up with what I needed for quite some time. Alas... new technology comes out and now I am quite a bit behind. Barrowed a friends Sig 2400. What I can say is WOW! Ranging out to 2000yards well beyond what I currently own.( old Tech Leica)
After reading the issues with the 2200 and 2000 here I did some searching and found out that the 2400 stepped it up with a smaller Beam devergance and is quite a bit better than the others. Of course it cost a lot more.
It will however be my next purchase. the SIG 2400AB. Making hits at 1425yds and 1957yds in the mountains convinced me.
Been in this Laser Range finder game for a long long time. The numbers have been over inflated for YEEEEEARS. I have to laugh.. the first Nikkon 400 I had in early 2000's would only read to about 200yds realiably... Then the 800 version that would read reliably to 600yds. Then the Bushnell 1000yds Read to 800. Then the 1600 Lecia would read to 1000yds. Like I said this has been going on for a Long long time. Not exclusive to one brand or the other in my experience. Like inflated BC's in the bullets. or Gas mileage of a car. Market hype.
Yea but the thread is SIG 2000 or 2200. The 2400 should go a little farther. It's a lot more money. I bekieve it can be bought without the program but still more money. I read a review saying that but can't find one without the program. It is still also hit and miss, some read far and some don't read for crap. I have seen it both ways and they were mounted on a tripod. Matt