mram10
I have the sig2000. Very consistent, light and best for the money imo. Tested swaro, bushnell 1500 and vortex ranger 1500. Hands down best of the 4.
There must be good ones and bad ones. We tested three SIG 2000 against 3 Swaro and 2 Terrapins. The Terripins won hands down, would read past 2000 easily on any target even in bright light. The Swarovski would go to 2000 on most objects. None of the Sigs would reach 2000 and struggled to go 1200 most the time. We did this on more then one day under more then one condition. They were also tripod mounted to help take out human error. MattI have the sig2000. Very consistent, light and best for the money imo. Tested swaro, bushnell 1500 and vortex ranger 1500. Hands down best of the 4.
You got lucky and got a good one. There ok if you do get one that works, but ALOT of them getting sent back. Go buy a lotto ticket while your luck is up !I have the sig2000. Very consistent, light and best for the money imo. Tested swaro, bushnell 1500 and vortex ranger 1500. Hands down best of the 4.
I have read where people called SIG and they said it was in Spec. All I know is three of my buddies have one and none of them will work as advertised. They are going to send them back. Apparently from what I see there are good ones and lots of bad ones. The rate seems to be about 50/50. All I know is we tested them against others and my 3 buddies did not work.Lucky? It is funny how biased people are. Ask around and read the forums and you’ll see mine isn’t the only functioning one leftThe sig has a lifetime warranty. The Leica is twice the price with a 2 year.
I'm now 3 out of 4 returned. Two 2000's and a 2200. Never had a issue with Leica or G7 and I use these a lot. Done with the sig.Lucky? It is funny how biased people are. Ask around and read the forums and you’ll see mine isn’t the only functioning one leftThe sig has a lifetime warranty. The Leica is twice the price with a 2 year.
The guy should feel lucky he got a good one. My experience is about like yours. Although they weren't mine, we tested them side by side to make sure it wasn't conditions. We also used a tripod to take out human error. We also ranged different distances and different objects. In the end all three failed. It has nothing to do with bias. It is just fact. I am honest and don't hardly ever bash a product. I also use a lot of different glass and rangefinder. All three guys are going to send them back. They were that bad. MattI'm now 3 out of 4 returned. Two 2000's and a 2200. Never had a issue with Leica or G7 and I use these a lot. Done with the sig.
Lucky? It is funny how biased people are. Ask around and read the forums and you’ll see mine isn’t the only functioning one leftThe sig has a lifetime warranty. The Leica is twice the price with a 2 year.
I now have my Sig Kilo 2000 RF up for sale. I hope the word doesn’t get out before I sell it. I fell dirty now. I’m done with Sig RF unless they get their act together.
Leica don’t really need a warranty, they do what manufacturers state they do and very rarely do you see any issues with them..Lucky? It is funny how biased people are. Ask around and read the forums and you’ll see mine isn’t the only functioning one leftThe sig has a lifetime warranty. The Leica is twice the price with a 2 year.