Dusty Stevens
Shiner
Two tents equal 2.9 holds
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dear Fguffey, I think whats going on here is that most people do not have those fancy gauges you have, and they use a certain bushing to get their bullet hold, only they say it in terms of thousands of an inch. And we all know that an annealed case is different than a hardened neck case as far as hold goes. Its just a simpified way of giving an approximation of their neck tension ( hold if you must). Your efforts spent on changing the modern day terminolgy would be better spent on you changing how to interpet what others are saying. When I seat a bullet with my Sinclair arbor press I have a mental number in my head from 1 to 10 . 1 being= (bullet movable with my fingers) I normally seat with a pressure # of 3 to 4. So thats how I will do it reguardless if its called tension or hold. And i will continue to describe it in thousands of an inch to others on this site, because I and others do not have hold force gauges.I was told everyone knew what everyone meant. I do not agree and I understand most simply can not deal with that. I believe the wrong standard is being used. I know; I have to explain that, I find it impossible to determine the color of a shirt with a ruler. When measuring the diameter of the bullet and inside diameter of the case neck I understand it sounds cool to use 'tension'. Outside of reloading the difference in the two diameters is referred to as bein 'interference' fit'. And then there is crush fit; I have put things together with tons of pressure.
And then there is tensions, I have tension gages, my tension gages do not measure crush fit nor do they measure interference fit.
I can measure the pressure required to seat a bullet in pounds, I can measure the amount of effort required to pull a bullet in pounds. I would like to take everyone seriously, but when seating bullets it has been found, after the discovery of seating bullets in pounds, not tensions, the interference fit is not an absolute.
F. Guffey
Canadian bushman -
It is a "fine tuning" step for me, in this order: 1)powder/primer 2)seating 3)neck tension
Donovan
My own reasoning why:Would you be willing to share why?
For those that agree neck tension matters, when should it be tested?
Before swaping primers?
After final seating depth test?
Will a loaded round favor a given neck size regardless of seating depth?
I will try, desperately, to keep that in mind when re testing neck tension.
Seems like both seating depth and neck tension both affect barrel time which is why it affects PRECISION. If they are different, I would like to hear reasons.My own reasoning why:
Powder charges inadvertently effect accuracy, velocity and pressure the most.
Seating can effect accuracy abruptly, but more limitedly to velocity and pressure then will powder.
Neck tension effects accuracy, but more limited then does seating, with very little effect on muzzle velocity.
My 2-Cents
Donovan
On a pressure trace, seating depth has little effect on engagement pressure, but can have some effect on peak pressure as well as exit pressure (Mv). Not at all in the extent as powder charges, but still some effects.Seems like both seating depth and neck tension both affect barrel time which is why it affects PRECISION. If they are different, I would like to hear reasons.
Myself, if I want the best accuracy out of my load, I have to test neck tension to see what amount produces the best accuracy. And at times revisit tension as the brass is cycled.
Donovan
On a pressure trace, seating depth has little effect on engagement pressure, but can have some effect on peak pressure as well as exit pressure (Mv). Not at all in the extent as powder charges, but still some effects.
As I wrote above, neck tension effects bullet engagement timing/pressure, that can also change the shape of the pressure curve, but has little effect on peak pressure or exit pressure (Mv).
And is why I feel it has less overall effect on accuracy then will seating, and is more of a fine tuning aspect then both seating and powder - IME
My 2-Cents
Donovan
For the record, I have hired Tom to be a full time "tester"... lolYour guess is as good as any, and I don't even try to act like I know. This is why I just test everything on paper. In my case, for rifles that can shoot the difference and need to be tuned, I do it at 1k. If there is anything, and mean anything, wrong with any aspect of rifle/load/system, it will show as vertical at 1000. Things that don't work are blatantly obvious, and things that do get verified. My picture that Donovan corrected, let's just say it's been verified!
Tom
Yes, sorry I did miss that.jlow -
Maybe you missed what I wrote in my post #81:
"For the most part, neck tension is an adjustment to barrel timing (bullet entrance & exit time)...."
With that, I am in total agreement with you !.!.!
Donovan
Probably typing/replying about the same time is why.... and figured you may have missed it !.!Yes, sorry I did miss that.