Thinking about doing this on my .308 forester micrometer seater. Is .015 generally enough for the bottom to contact the case and not the shell holder?
jsthntn247 said:Thinking about doing this on my .308 forester micrometer seater. Is .015 generally enough for the bottom to contact the case and not the shell holder?
stubbicatt said:Just measured the sleeve on my Whidden 6.5x47 die. I took a new case and inserted it into the sleeve, and with the tail of a vernier caliper came up with 0.147"
Correct me if I am wrong, but this should give nearly .023" clearance between the shell holder (properly machined) and the bottom of the sleeve, so that it is not touching??
Regards,
Stubb
amlevin said:mikecr said:amlevin what's the loaded runout off bullets?
Your new expander 'football' may not be doing anything. That is, not driving the thickness variance outward.
I haven't loaded this latest batch of brass yet. Later today or tomorrow. I'll try and remember to give the results.
Earlier R/O's have been in the .001-.003" range with a few as much as .005".
I know that the expander is contacting the inside of the case and is expanding. Measurements of ID before and after show this to be the case.
bigedp51 said:amlevin and BoydAllen
Your both forcing me to get a better runout gauge, all I have is the RCBS Case Mastering Gauge. And the V-blocks are effected by finger pressure and dance all over the place. Add that to all the coffee I drink and my runout measurements look like a heart rate monitor and a patient with tachycardia.
bigedp51 said:CatShooter said:I cut the bottom 15 thou off of my sleeves in a lathe.
I don't have a lathe and the sleeve is too big to chuck in a drill, all I have left is a bench grinder but I'm having visions of the sleeve turning blue and smoking.
So what other primitive method would you advise for a ill equipped home project. I'm retired now and no longer have access to our shop equipment and most of it was too big to fit in my pocket before I retired. :![]()
savageshooter86 said:so the measurement of seating dies with the sleeves to check for clearance is with a sized case only or one with a bullet ? May check this with my Whidden and Forster seaters
dmoran said:As to modifying seating sleeves; all is fine and dandy if your brass has equal headspace/shoulder. If you have variance in the headspace/shoulder your seating depths will also very, when the case is pushing the sleeve verses the shell holder. There are pro's and con's to both ways.
My 2-cents
Donovan
bigedp51 said:"... suggestions?"
CatShooter said:bigedp51 said:"... suggestions?"
Send them back with a case marked like you have done. I had a Redding body die that had the same problem (it comes from a chipped reamer), and it was replaced, with apologizes.
BoydAllen said:The seating depth is controlled by the distance from the surface in the shell holder that the case sits on to the seating stem in the die. The sleeve has nothing to do with it at all, its function is to align the case before the bullet is seated. Shortening the sleeve allows the case to find a closer fit at the top of the sleeve, where the shoulder makes contact, so that it is better centered as the bullet is seated.