Is that you?View attachment 1149136
Above is what I like most about my Teslong's:
(setup is a $50 Teslong plugged into a small laptop displayed to a 33" Vizio, with the probe approximately 27" down a 31" barrel)
Besides price, below is what I dislike most about a Hawkeye verses the Teslong:
View attachment 1149135
I'm not that white haired yet.... (getting close though)Is that you?![]()
I have never had the opportunity to look through a Hawkeye, but a poster from another forum sent me this:
"I have (inherited) a 2016, $1,500 Hawkeye borescope with all the bells & whistles.
The clarity isn't $1,425 better than what you've shown."
Answers my questions!![]()
I really dont think so. I look at every chamber i do and after owning the teslong for a month i havent used it for that purpose yet. I can study a chamber and take a break before i can get a teslong fired up. It has its place but most that use a hawkeye wont fit this into replacing it but will use it for leisure (this is why theres not a rush to sell them)I believe the Hawkeye will go down the same path as buggy whips. New tech replacing old tech.
I really dont think so. I look at every chamber i do and after owning the teslong for a month i havent used it for that purpose yet. I can study a chamber and take a break before i can get a teslong fired up. It has its place but most that use a hawkeye wont fit this into replacing it but will use it for leisure (this is why theres not a rush to sell them)
Makes you wonder why we spend so much time and money getting a barrel and chamber perfect?Being a retired machinist with 43 years background, I am in agreement with what caused this abomination of a chamber job. I do not understand your second sentence. This barrel left the factory in the above condition. This barrel had a single proof load fired before I got a hold of it. I just screwed it on to a 48 year old action and did not mess with the chamber.
Mass produced junk ? ..... yeah, maybe....but... I had it out on the bench for a test after our silhouette match today. Yesterday I loaded up 50 rounds of a load that several other Rem. takeoff barrels I have like a lot.
40.0 grs., IMR 4320, 140 gr. Sierra flat base pro hunter. I got a good 200 meter zero in the first ten shots.
Then I fired 20 more at 300 meters and beyond. This test was done in 12-15 mph quartering winds. I am more than happy with the accuracy from this cheap barrel for use as another practice or loaner gun. I will clean it and show what 50 shots look like.
SIX SHOTS @ 200 METERS
View attachment 1149654
FOUR SHOTS @ 300 METERS
View attachment 1149655
Thank you Mike, much appreciated!Can someone please indicate which Teslong is the right one to order? I know I need the WiFi model, but are there more than one WiFi versions??
You need the Teslong model NTG100W will work Iphone, Ipad, and Android products. Currently out of stock at Teslong, but may be available on Amazon (I didn't check). Price is 74.99 on Teslong suspect the Amazon price is the same. Teslong has 7 models of borescope this is the wifi one.
Mike
I own a Hawkeye borescope with the 90 degree eyepiece and don't regret buying it for $1100 years ago. I would say that most of us who do own them purchased them before the current digital borescopes became available. Although they were expensive they were the best rifle borescopes available at the time. The Hawkeye was and still is a valuable tool used by both gunsmiths and shooters. Did I get my money's worth out of the Hawkeye, the answer is yes and I feel that I couldn't have got along without it. I have recently purchased a new Teslong Wireless WiFi Borescope and really like it and it's features and to me the quality of the pictures is just great.I have never had the opportunity to look through a Hawkeye, but a poster from another forum sent me this:
"I have (inherited) a 2016, $1,500 Hawkeye borescope with all the bells & whistles.
The clarity isn't $1,425 better than what you've shown."
Answers my questions!![]()