Don't you just hate that no forum dictionary seems think Metrology is correctly spelled?There is a term in metrology for precisely that. Tampering.
Don't you just hate that no forum dictionary seems think Metrology is correctly spelled?There is a term in metrology for precisely that. Tampering.
Don't you just hate that no forum dictionary seems think Metrology is correctly spelled?
There is a term in metrology for precisely that. Tampering.
I would like to buy some various weights from you.The original post was in January. I made my standard for free out of stainless steel. All I want to use it for is to adjust my zero on the beam. It's a piece of metal and it's weight doesn't change. I weighed it at work to at least 4 decimals. Repeatability not accuracy. If it's an electronic scale the same deal does it weigh what it's supposed to be?
i need to buy a GOOD set of scale check weights. Please throw some options at me as to which weights are accurate and reliable.
Also, let me know which weights you would not recommend due to inconsistency of weight.
A very entertaining (and a little old) thread.i need to buy a GOOD set of scale check weights. Please throw some options at me as to which weights are accurate and reliable.
Also, let me know which weights you would not recommend due to inconsistency of weight.
I made my own weights at work out of stainless steel and weighed them on a very accurate lab scale. There is no need to weigh accurately. You just want to see if the scale weighs the piece of metal the same each time. before use.I bought a cheap set off ebay. They are as precise as the weights that came with my ChargeMaster.
I'm not too concerned about an inert chunk of metal somehow becoming unreliable. Am I missing something?
Ahh Jim, the old scale in the picture would more properly be called a balance, it doesn't weigh anything. You need to zero it using a known mass. This particular one was made by Pacific, and at a total guess, probably dates from the 1950's. It's not damped in any way and just so simple there's very little to go wrong.Nothing is wrong with them.
In fact comforting to have them .
Tell me about that old scale in the picture, very cool

Been using the same 40 Gr VMAX for 14 years.Sorry you feel so strongly about my posts. Maybe i should be on your ignore lists so as to not cloud up your reloading prowess. If your scale check bullet varies in weight you should invest in a new scale.
I use a bullet, A 150gr SMK I chk my scale for zero and 150grs but I use beam scales, that I tuned myself under the shadetree, I done the work in the Lab at work, where I use to work it has some very accurate equipment, scales, Zeiss CMM, blah blah 23 computers, and quiet room where there is no dust, temp is controlled no vibrations blah blah, lab coats, nice surface plates, tools, Renshaw equipExact weight matters none. The best check weight is a bullet that you scratch the weight into and keep with the scale. No need to waste money on check weights
still very good reading/A very entertaining (and a little old) thread.
Apparently you didn't read and absorb what Varget said. He said keep the same bullet with the scale to check it.This has got to be one of DUMBEST POSTS i have seen,bullets vary in weight,JOIN the NIT CLUB
