OK, I’ll bite.LHSmith said:jlow said:The last group would be the bench rest shooter who is actually looking for a soft neck to reduce the influence of neck tension. They can in fact accept a certain degree of variability as the softness of the neck has less influence on accuracy/precision.
NO....NO....and just plain WRONG assumption.
Winning credentials in Registered Benchrest Competition represents real world proven -documented performance......and THAT trumps all the internet theories ever concocted. Now I know why fewer and fewer accomplished shooters are willing to share their hard-earned knowledge on these sites.
The reason I for my comment is when you are in that soft neck region of the annealing curve, it is falling off a cliff and so much harder to control absolute softness (so not a criticism of technique). Your comment says I am wrong but has contributed nothing to address whether softness is in fact consistent or not. I accept the fact that the good shooters do really well at the target, that is not a point of contention, just saying that the slightly higher degree of variation in softness does not affect that.
This is what bothers me a bit about the information on this board. The really good guys comes up and say no but don’t back it up with information or techniques. Even if you are right, it does not help the rest of us.
If a person is not contributing, then what exactly is he doing, this is why sometimes you get the "bragging" comment.