• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Velocity Question

Here is QuickLoad's answer on the barrel length question. When I reference the "image", I am referring to the image on Post #1. 12.9 grains of H4895 will generate 7230 psi of chamber pressure and an exit velocity of 1013 fps from a 24" barrel. A 16" barrel will be reduced to 917 fps. Chamber pressure is not affected by the length of the barrel. Fair agreement on the velocity (1057 fps) from a 24" barrel in the image data.

The maximum chamber/barrel pressure (7730 psi) is generated when the bullet has moved slightly less than an inch down the barrel. The vast majority of the powder has been burned at this point. The chamber/barrel pressure at the point that the bullet exits the barrel is 1469 psi. Any powder that is not burned at the point of the Pmax will be burned down the barrel. But it will not contribute to the acceleration of the bullet. As seen from the trace below, there is not enough gases generated from remaining powder to fill the increase of chamber/barrel volume as the bullet moves down the barrel and the pressure starts to drop off. The acceleration of the bullet, as it moves down the barrel is due to the momentum generated by powder burned up to the point of Pmax. See pressure trace below.

The chamber pressure presented for the four powders in the image is questionable. The image values range from 20,700 psi to 27,200 psi. For a 12.9 grain H4895 load for three of the four powders, the range is 7730 psi to 8166 per QL. The fourth powder, Trail Boss is a question by itself. The three powders are fairly close on the Powder Burn Rate Chart, 85-99. As such, you would expect equal charges of powders would generate close chamber pressures. And, in fact, that is what is seen by the QL Model; 7730 psi to 8166 psi. A review of the image shows the same trait for the three powders, but the range is much higher: 20,700 psi to 24,800 psi. The fourth powder, Trail Boss, is bulky fast burning powder (23), much faster than the other three. The image data presents a chamber pressure of 27,200 psi for a 12.9 grain H4895. This pressure is fairly close to the other three powders. The faster the powder burn rate, the higher the chamber pressure for a given load. The QL Model calculates a chamber pressure of 37,314 psi, which is easier to believe. It is questionable if 12.9 grains of Trail Boss can be contained in a 308 Win case. QL calculates a filled case volume of 111.7%. See table below. A couple of other slower powders have been added to the chart for additional information. The other three powders have filled case volumes ranging from 37.6% to 38.8%. The pressure data in the image are questionable, but the velocity data are fairly close.

12.9 grains H4895, 24" barrel, 70F
Powder-------------FPS---------PSI-------Filled Capacity--------Burn Rate
Benchmark---------1043--------8166----------38.2-------------------90
H4895--------------1013--------7730----------37.6-------------------99
H322---------------1111--------8071----------38.8-------------------85
Trail Boss-----------1482-------37314---------111.7------------------23
IMR 4064-----------1000-------7130----------39.9-------------------106
IMR 4350-----------958--------6083----------37.8-------------------130
Red Dot-------------1760------53717---------75.6--------------------9

I don't see the use of "fillers" in reduced powder loads have been mentioned. It is generally recommended that a case volume filler be used for reduced charge loads if the powder burn rate is higher than Alliant 2400 and the filled case capacity is less than 80%. The intent is to ensure that the powder is held against the primer and proper ignition of the powder is obtained. This is to prevent the somewhat rare Secondary Explosion Effect. The S.E.E. is the catastrophic failure of some rifles while firing seemingly reasonable handloads or reduced loads using slow-burning powders. It is somewhat rare but when it occurs there is a high probability of shooter injury. Just a word of caution.

Sorry for the long post. Hope this is beneficial.

1756405090951.png
 
Last edited:
Here is QuickLoad's answer on the barrel length question. When I reference the "image", I am referring to the image on Post #1. 12.9 grains of H4895 will generate 7230 psi of chamber pressure and an exit velocity of 1013 fps from a 24" barrel. A 16" barrel will be reduced to 917 fps. Chamber pressure is not affected by the length of the barrel. Fair agreement on the velocity (1057 fps) from a 24" barrel in the image data.

The maximum chamber/barrel pressure (7730 psi) is generated when the bullet has moved slightly less than an inch down the barrel. The vast majority of the powder has been burned at this point. The chamber/barrel pressure at the point that the bullet exits the barrel is 1469 psi. Any powder that is not burned at the point of the Pmax will be burned down the barrel. But it will not contribute to the acceleration of the bullet. As seen from the trace below, there is not enough gases generated from remaining powder to fill the increase of chamber/barrel volume as the bullet moves down the barrel and the pressure starts to drop off. The acceleration of the bullet, as it moves down the barrel is due to the momentum generated by powder burned up to the point of Pmax. See pressure trace below.

The chamber pressure presented for the four powders in the image is questionable. The image values range from 20,700 psi to 27,200 psi. For a 12.9 grain H4895 load for three of the four powders, the range is 7730 psi to 8166 per QL. The fourth powder, Trail Boss is a question by itself. The three powders are fairly close on the Powder Burn Rate Chart, 85-99. As such, you would expect equal charges of powders would generate close chamber pressures. And, in fact, that is what is seen by the QL Model; 7730 psi to 8166 psi. A review of the image shows the same trait for the three powders, but the range is much higher: 20,700 psi to 24,800 psi. The fourth powder, Trail Boss, is bulky fast burning powder (23), much faster than the other three. The image data presents a chamber pressure of 27,200 psi for a 12.9 grain H4895. This pressure is fairly close to the other three powders. The faster the powder burn rate, the higher the chamber pressure for a given load. The QL Model calculates a chamber pressure of 37,314 psi, which is easier to believe. It is questionable if 12.9 grains of H4895 can be contained in a 308 Win case. QL calculates a filled case volume of 111.7%. See table below. A couple of other slower powders have been added to the chart for additional information. The other three powders have filled case volumes ranging from 37.6% to 38.8%. The pressure data in the image are questionable, but the velocity data are fairly close.

12.9 grains H4895, 24" barrel, 70F
Powder-------------FPS---------PSI-------Filled Capacity--------Burn Rate
Benchmark---------1043--------8166----------38.2-------------------90
H4895--------------1013--------7730----------37.6-------------------99
H322---------------1111--------8071----------38.8-------------------85
Trail Boss-----------1482-------37314---------111.7------------------23
IMR 4064-----------1000-------7130----------39.9-------------------106
IMR 4350-----------958--------6083----------37.8-------------------130
Red Dot-------------1760------53717---------75.6--------------------9

I don't see the use of "fillers" in reduced powder loads have been mentioned. It is generally recommended that a case volume filler be used for reduced charge loads if the powder burn rate is higher than Alliant 2400 and the filled case capacity is less than 80%. The intent is to ensure that the powder is held against the primer and proper ignition of the powder is obtained. This is to prevent the somewhat rare Secondary Explosion Effect. The S.E.E. is the catastrophic failure of some rifles while firing seemingly reasonable handloads or reduced loads using slow-burning powders. It is somewhat rare but when it occurs there is a high probability of shooter injury. Just a word of caution.

Sorry for the long post. Hope this is beneficial.

View attachment 1690032
Would not be the first time that both Quickload and Hodgdon have been off. When there is a discrepancy I lean towards what should be an actual live test vs a computer generated model. But don’t really trust manufactures either. Hornady has had loads listed with bullets jammed hard into the lands and won’t chamber. Simply check any manual out there for published corrections/errata

The second thing is we have the Op’s own results in post #27. Normally what one would do is adjust Quickload to match your own results.

Third, I’ve had enough experience with Quickload, reduced loads and long barrels that trust but verify is part of every load and powder. Some are better than other.

At some point you mixed data for 4895 and trail boss, doesn’t really change the end results, but it’s a confusing conclusion when you say 12.9 grains of 4895 will have a load density of 111.7%.
 
Loading up some .308 loads for subsonic use. While looking at the Hodgdon manual was curious. If the load data states
Barrel 24”
Twist: 1:12”

The specific load I am looking at is
H4895, 12.9grains,
FPS: 1057,
20,700PSI

How much different will my velocity be with the folllowing gun set up if I use the same load data listed in the book.
Barrel: 16”
Twist: 1:10”

Thanks.

Travis
I’m struggling to believe that load would work at all. In my experience, a slower powder needs to fill the cartridge more to properly ignite and burn.

I loaded some 45-70 for my son with 3031 and started at 3 grains under min. First shot through the chrony was 1345 fps but it didn’t go boom it went fffffpppp. The rifle is a CVA Scout so it’s break open and easy to check the bore. There was a lot of unburnt powder. Probably could have dumped it out and made another load for it! Anyway, got looking closer at the chrony and it was 134.5. Shot it a few more times with the same results.

I had a similar experience with 44 mag, also in a rifle. I was trying to find out which of my slower pistol powders would work best with a reduced load (13gr) and a 250gr bullet. Specifically, I wanted to see if Lilgun would work. I tried them with and without fillers. Blue Dot worked well, which didn’t surprise me. 4227 and LilGun worked very well with fillers but not without them. 296 didn’t work at all, with or without filler. LilGun actually worked best with the highest velocities.

I shoot mostly cast bullets in my 308. Bullet I’ve settled on is a NOE 225gr smooth shank, gas checked semi spitzer. 18gr of IMR 4227 gives me about 1550 fps, 17gr of Lilgun is about 1680. (I’m not near my load notes but I’m pretty sure I’m really close on the fps) I don’t use any filler for these loads.

I’ve also loaded this bullet with 43 gr of IMR 8133 and magnum primers. This one was about 2100 fps and I killed a buck with it at 160 yards 2 years ago.

I know I’m talking about softer cast bullets vs your harder jacketed bullets. I honestly don’t know what difference that would make. Just for comparison though, I also load rifle cast loads with Bullseye, Unique and BE-86…
 
Maybe I’m late to the party…. You are trying to get an AR10 to operate using subsonic loads using a 175gr projectile? I assume you are using 175gr do to your 1:10 twist rate.

You are attempting to tune down (lighten) the AR10 so that it may perform better with the subsonic rounds by swapping out the AR10 buffer system with the one you have in an AR15?

The 300BO (AR15) is purpose built for .30 cal subsonic and most don’t use projectiles below 190gr. In general, 175gr projectiles doesn’t generate enough pressure to reliably function the BCG in AR15 even with a pistol length gas port. To get it to happen would take a bit of tweaking … Dellet would be the person to know.

Don’t get me wrong - it can be done in an AR15, but maybe not in AR10. There are significant difference in both the mass and with cycle distance of BCG between the two platforms. This is adding to your challenge. Your gas tube length might be additional problem and may require you to increase the port size to allow more gas to be capture to improve cycling the BCG.

Surely you have a Rem 700 laying around which would eliminate 90% of theses issues or perhaps time to build 300BO upper and buy a couple of boxes of 190Gr bullets
 
Last edited:
Maybe I’m late to the party…. You are trying to get an AR10 to operate using subsonic loads using a 175gr projectile? I assume you are using 175gr do to your 1:10 twist rate.

You are attempting to tune down (lighten) the AR10 so that it may perform better with the subsonic rounds by swapping out the AR10 buffer system with the one you have in an AR15?

The 300BO (AR15) is purpose built for .30 cal subsonic and most don’t use projectiles below 190gr. In general, 175gr projectiles doesn’t generate enough pressure to reliably function the BCG in AR15 even with a pistol length gas port. To get it to happen would take a bit of tweaking … Dellet would be the person to know.

Don’t get me wrong - it can be done in an AR15, but maybe not in AR10. There are significant difference in both the mass and with cycle distance of BCG between the two platforms. This is adding to your challenge. Your gas tube length might be additional problem and may require you to increase the port size to allow more gas to be capture to improve cycling the BCG.

Surely you have a Rem 700 laying around which would eliminate 90% of theses issues or perhaps time to build 300BO upper and buy a couple of boxes of 190Gr bullets
Who asked for an adult opinion? :confused:

He’s that close to get it working, I think it can. Maybe a powder change to something cleaner would be helpful.

Besides I’ve come up with worse loads for the Blackout.
 
Would not be the first time that both Quickload and Hodgdon have been off. When there is a discrepancy I lean towards what should be an actual live test vs a computer generated model. But don’t really trust manufactures either. Hornady has had loads listed with bullets jammed hard into the lands and won’t chamber. Simply check any manual out there for published corrections/errata

The second thing is we have the Op’s own results in post #27. Normally what one would do is adjust Quickload to match your own results.

Third, I’ve had enough experience with Quickload, reduced loads and long barrels that trust but verify is part of every load and powder. Some are better than other.

At some point you mixed data for 4895 and trail boss, doesn’t really change the end results, but it’s a confusing conclusion when you say 12.9 grains of 4895 will have a load density of 111.7%.
Nice catch on the H4895. It has been corrected.

I too like to verify when possible. I use both QL and GRT to compare and develop loads. GRT is especially helpful in comparing actual measured velocity to the modeled velocity and recalibrating the powder burn rate.

I was not really questioning with the slight differences in the predicted and observed velocities. I was more interested in the differences between predicted chamber pressure and the chamber pressures in the image data. Errors in velocity data will not hurt you, errors in chamber pressure data can hurt you.
 
I love these types of threads that start at "This is what I want.... Why isn't it working?" to pragmatic problem solving and potential solutions... to deeper technical dives and more in-depth conversations... and ultimately coming full circle to failures and confessions ... "Oh, yeah I forgot to do that." or "I just decided to try and do it because I had extra parts laying around or bought a lot of the bullets that I can't find a use for so why not."

Both informative and entertaining. Whose going to kickoff the Confession phase of this thread with start confessing what they did wrong that taught them what they should have done?! :)
 
I love these types of threads that start at "This is what I want.... Why isn't it working?" to pragmatic problem solving and potential solutions... to deeper technical dives and more in-depth conversations... and ultimately coming full circle to failures and confessions ... "Oh, yeah I forgot to do that." or "I just decided to try and do it because I had extra parts laying around or bought a lot of the bullets that I can't find a use for so why not."

Both informative and entertaining. Whose going to kickoff the Confession phase of this thread with start confessing what they did wrong that taught them what they should have done?! :)
The boss is gonna need a bigger server :eek:

Not exactly sure what you’re looking for, but I have a list of failures for every success. Below are a couple notable ones that learning so called “advanced techniques” got me through.

The donor case was too thick, there’s a time to neck turn, there’s a time to inside ream. Converting 17 WSM to 25 rimfire, you split a lot less necks if you trim about .030” off the mouth, the area that used to be the crimp.
IMG_7850.jpeg
As per the above discussion. Peak pressure is great to know, but muzzle pressure if it’s a gas fed gun, is possibly more important if you want it to work. It’s also possible to have a “safe” peak pressure, but if the bolt thrust is too much, you’re in big trouble. Knowing the difference between all three is a pretty good idea.
 
The reason I'm thinking similar speeds or maybe even slightly faster is that low amount of powder charge is going to burn out quickly.

And if it burns out at the 16-20 inch mark, the remaining 4-8" of barrel are just going to increase friction/drag on the bullet and cause it to slow down.

But more than likely I'm 50% wrong
The pressure doesn't disappear when the powder burns out.
 
Ok guys so was able to get out and shoot some loads today. As in the past the 175gr Hornady sub-x performed as they did previously.

Shoot the 190gr subsonic bullets with 9g of Clays. See attached pic Img 3866 and 3867 was at 50yds. Now I weighed out each charge with the Lyman gen6 and then double checked with a digital rcbs scale. I had to add a little powder as the Lyman Gen6 was slightly off by .1grns.

Shoot the 175gr at 100yds. And that can be seen in img 3869. My chrony wasn’t linked to my phone by the fps I had were the following 1031, 1034, 1074 and 1082.

As for the bolt not going all the way back as I have shown in previous post.
The original buffer weight and spring were pretty heavy so I couldn’t get rifle to cycle, added buffer weight and spring from AR15 and the gun would cycle but the bolt didn’t seem to go back all the way. It was determined that the AR15 spring and weight while lighter were slightly longer and the spring was getting to tight so hence the bolt wouldn’t go back all the way installed original spring and buffer weight but no more ammo so have to fine tune gas block next to get gun to cycle.

Travis
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3866.png
    IMG_3866.png
    153.9 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_3867.jpeg
    IMG_3867.jpeg
    712.5 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_3869.jpeg
    IMG_3869.jpeg
    785.7 KB · Views: 5

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,327
Messages
2,216,671
Members
79,554
Latest member
GerSteve
Back
Top