If you run a 10 Round Load Development Ladder Test will your node typically be around the same powder charge if you reduce/increase your seating depth?
30 BR Depth Test
This was shot starting at .018 out of hard jam and moved in to .004 out of hard jam. The velocity increased slightly and then stopped increasing as I could feel the difference in depth when closing the bolt on the last 3 targets. The sample is small but the ES was good so this may help answer the question about velocity increase. I really don't like 3 shot groups as they tend to produce less than accurate results so take this for what it is worth.
View attachment 1245819
The downloadable PDF files are available free on brflags.comAre these targets available for sale?
Excellent write up. Thank you for posting this.A typical 6 Dasher with a new bbl running a Berger 105 Hybrid with an identical charge weight showing velocity at the muzzle on the vertical axis and seating depth on the horizontal axis. Three strings of the same test. From touching to 80 thousandths jump went from 2986 to 2950.
For perspective, some folks consider 80 thousandths to be a lot of jump, and others don't.
View attachment 1246026
Here are the verticals at 600 yards for those same runs. The vertical dimension of the entire test spans -0.6 to +0.25 MOA or 0.85 MOA top to bottom for a seating depth spread from touch to 0.080" jump.
View attachment 1246027
Here was the first string that was run for charge weight using an arbitrary jump of 0.015" just as an easy starting point. I took 31.9 grains of Varget and went with it for those tests above. The blue line is the velocity with the left scale, the red line is the vertical at 600 yards in MOA on the right scale. Positive compensation from about 31.5 to 32.5 grains, which explains my 31.9 above.
View attachment 1246028
My conclusion is that if I start with seating depth of about 0.030" jump, I can let it wear for about 0.025" before I need to check it again. What I don't want to do, is start it at 0.015 jump, because it will then open up to about 1/2 MOA before it drops again.
I shoot sling, so anything under 0.4 MOA is good enough for low effort.
ETA: somebody asked to show the target for the ladder run, so hear is what that looks like. No attempt at wind, just hold the X and pull the trigger. Shot number 10 would be 31.8 grains for reference.
View attachment 1246029
Dang. Just when I thought I was beginning to understand. I got to go back to schoolI ran some tests with QuickLoad and found that changing the jump has a similar result as changing the load. Over a small change like +/- 1 % it was a similar amount.
I did this as I always felt that adjusting the jump did nothing more than changing the load a bit. I don't believe that different barrels "Like" one jump more than another. "like" is not a term engineers agree on!
I tune my new barrels (after breaking them in) by shooting 5 5shot groups in round robin fashion. I record Mv
and find the avg. Mv as well as Es. I don't have to shoot at a target as I am getting Mv data. Then I plot it in EXCEL and do a 4th order polynomial curve fit to find the real curve and pick the powder load for lowest Es. I use a barrel tuner so then I shoot groups with adjustments till I find the best group.
If you don't use a tuner, you may want to shot groups with the different loads and plot group sizes , do a curve and a 4th order polynomial on that data to find best load.
4th order polynomial? of what?I ran some tests with QuickLoad and found that changing the jump has a similar result as changing the load. Over a small change like +/- 1 % it was a similar amount.
I did this as I always felt that adjusting the jump did nothing more than changing the load a bit. I don't believe that different barrels "Like" one jump more than another. "like" is not a term engineers agree on!
I tune my new barrels (after breaking them in) by shooting 5 5shot groups in round robin fashion. I record Mv
and find the avg. Mv as well as Es. I don't have to shoot at a target as I am getting Mv data. Then I plot it in EXCEL and do a 4th order polynomial curve fit to find the real curve and pick the powder load for lowest Es. I use a barrel tuner so then I shoot groups with adjustments till I find the best group.
If you don't use a tuner, you may want to shot groups with the different loads and plot group sizes , do a curve and a 4th order polynomial on that data to find best load.