• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Velocity node question?

It has been my experience that seating depth will "move the ladder", but not to the magnitude of powder weight. I would really like to see this thread develop - it is a very interesting concept.
Does seating depth have an effect on velocity?
 
30 BR Depth Test
This was shot starting at .018 out of hard jam and moved in to .004 out of hard jam. The velocity increased slightly and then stopped increasing as I could feel the difference in depth when closing the bolt on the last 3 targets. The sample is small but the ES was good so this may help answer the question about velocity increase. I really don't like 3 shot groups as they tend to produce less than accurate results so take this for what it is worth.



Target 30 BR.JPG
 
30 BR Depth Test
This was shot starting at .018 out of hard jam and moved in to .004 out of hard jam. The velocity increased slightly and then stopped increasing as I could feel the difference in depth when closing the bolt on the last 3 targets. The sample is small but the ES was good so this may help answer the question about velocity increase. I really don't like 3 shot groups as they tend to produce less than accurate results so take this for what it is worth.



View attachment 1245819

Are these targets available for sale?
 

Here are free targets on accurateshooter.
 
In my testing , the velocity increases weren't enough to change the node data , as I seated the bullet towards more "jump" . I don't Jam anything so I have no idea on that . Only when I got to the 200.20x , and a heavier powder load , did I see noticeable velocity change , but not enough to go to a higher node . Halfway , maybe ?
 
A typical 6 Dasher with a new bbl running a Berger 105 Hybrid with an identical charge weight showing velocity at the muzzle on the vertical axis and seating depth on the horizontal axis. Three strings of the same test. From touching to 80 thousandths jump went from 2986 to 2950.

For perspective, some folks consider 80 thousandths to be a lot of jump, and others don't.

1617260635813.png

Here are the verticals at 600 yards for those same runs. The vertical dimension of the entire test spans -0.6 to +0.25 MOA or 0.85 MOA top to bottom for a seating depth spread from touch to 0.080" jump.

1617260913510.png

Here was the first string that was run for charge weight using an arbitrary jump of 0.015" just as an easy starting point. I took 31.9 grains of Varget and went with it for those tests above. The blue line is the velocity with the left scale, the red line is the vertical at 600 yards in MOA on the right scale. Positive compensation from about 31.5 to 32.5 grains, which explains my 31.9 above.

1617261351313.png

My conclusion is that if I start with seating depth of about 0.030" jump, I can let it wear for about 0.025" before I need to check it again. What I don't want to do, is start it at 0.015 jump, because it will then open up to about 1/2 MOA before it drops again.

I shoot sling, so anything under 0.4 MOA is good enough for low effort.
ETA: somebody asked to show the target for the ladder run, so hear is what that looks like. No attempt at wind, just hold the X and pull the trigger. Shot number 10 would be 31.8 grains for reference.

1617262501830.png
 
Last edited:
A typical 6 Dasher with a new bbl running a Berger 105 Hybrid with an identical charge weight showing velocity at the muzzle on the vertical axis and seating depth on the horizontal axis. Three strings of the same test. From touching to 80 thousandths jump went from 2986 to 2950.

For perspective, some folks consider 80 thousandths to be a lot of jump, and others don't.

View attachment 1246026

Here are the verticals at 600 yards for those same runs. The vertical dimension of the entire test spans -0.6 to +0.25 MOA or 0.85 MOA top to bottom for a seating depth spread from touch to 0.080" jump.

View attachment 1246027

Here was the first string that was run for charge weight using an arbitrary jump of 0.015" just as an easy starting point. I took 31.9 grains of Varget and went with it for those tests above. The blue line is the velocity with the left scale, the red line is the vertical at 600 yards in MOA on the right scale. Positive compensation from about 31.5 to 32.5 grains, which explains my 31.9 above.

View attachment 1246028

My conclusion is that if I start with seating depth of about 0.030" jump, I can let it wear for about 0.025" before I need to check it again. What I don't want to do, is start it at 0.015 jump, because it will then open up to about 1/2 MOA before it drops again.

I shoot sling, so anything under 0.4 MOA is good enough for low effort.
ETA: somebody asked to show the target for the ladder run, so hear is what that looks like. No attempt at wind, just hold the X and pull the trigger. Shot number 10 would be 31.8 grains for reference.

View attachment 1246029
Excellent write up. Thank you for posting this.
 
I ran some tests with QuickLoad and found that changing the jump has a similar result as changing the load. Over a small change like +/- 1 % it was a similar amount.
I did this as I always felt that adjusting the jump did nothing more than changing the load a bit. I don't believe that different barrels "Like" one jump more than another. "like" is not a term engineers agree on!
I tune my new barrels (after breaking them in) by shooting 5 5shot groups in round robin fashion. I record Mv
and find the avg. Mv as well as Es. I don't have to shoot at a target as I am getting Mv data. Then I plot it in EXCEL and do a 4th order polynomial curve fit to find the real curve and pick the powder load for lowest Es. I use a barrel tuner so then I shoot groups with adjustments till I find the best group.
If you don't use a tuner, you may want to shot groups with the different loads and plot group sizes , do a curve and a 4th order polynomial on that data to find best load.
 
I ran some tests with QuickLoad and found that changing the jump has a similar result as changing the load. Over a small change like +/- 1 % it was a similar amount.
I did this as I always felt that adjusting the jump did nothing more than changing the load a bit. I don't believe that different barrels "Like" one jump more than another. "like" is not a term engineers agree on!
I tune my new barrels (after breaking them in) by shooting 5 5shot groups in round robin fashion. I record Mv
and find the avg. Mv as well as Es. I don't have to shoot at a target as I am getting Mv data. Then I plot it in EXCEL and do a 4th order polynomial curve fit to find the real curve and pick the powder load for lowest Es. I use a barrel tuner so then I shoot groups with adjustments till I find the best group.
If you don't use a tuner, you may want to shot groups with the different loads and plot group sizes , do a curve and a 4th order polynomial on that data to find best load.
Dang. Just when I thought I was beginning to understand. I got to go back to school :)
 
Maybe that explains why I couldn’t figure out my recent speed loss! All I did was move my seating depth from -015 to -070 on a 26” BRA. Went from 2920 to 2885. (And an additional .3 of Varget to get the speed back)
 
I ran some tests with QuickLoad and found that changing the jump has a similar result as changing the load. Over a small change like +/- 1 % it was a similar amount.
I did this as I always felt that adjusting the jump did nothing more than changing the load a bit. I don't believe that different barrels "Like" one jump more than another. "like" is not a term engineers agree on!
I tune my new barrels (after breaking them in) by shooting 5 5shot groups in round robin fashion. I record Mv
and find the avg. Mv as well as Es. I don't have to shoot at a target as I am getting Mv data. Then I plot it in EXCEL and do a 4th order polynomial curve fit to find the real curve and pick the powder load for lowest Es. I use a barrel tuner so then I shoot groups with adjustments till I find the best group.
If you don't use a tuner, you may want to shot groups with the different loads and plot group sizes , do a curve and a 4th order polynomial on that data to find best load.
4th order polynomial? of what?
 
JELENKO,

In EXCEL I plot a curve of Mv vs Load weight. This yields a curve of the transfer equation of Mv vs load. Then I drop over and look for trending and click other and I can convert the above transfer equation into a 4th (or 5th order polynomial equation of the actual equation of Mv vs load with much more accuracy.
In my case, the first plot showed the lowest ES was at 30.5 gr. By doing an exact equation ( to a 4th or 5th
order). The original plot only connects the discrete data points and the curve fitting part of EXCEL finds the best 4th order polynomial equation solution. This told me the actual node was 30.55gr and ES was slightly lower than the 30.5 data point.
This is important to me as My lab balance (on gram scale) is accurate to .015 gr where on grains it truncates to 0.020gr
 
I also looked at the data from my quickload experiment of changes in Mv and Bt vs jump and load weight.

As I use the curves I generate from testing load vs Es, I found that a 0.3 gr change of load yields a barrel time change of 0.018ms (from 1.341ms.) and 0.05in change in jump yielded 0.018ms change (from 1.341ms.
As I am looking for the load with the lowest ES, I am actually looking for a barrel time which is proportional to longitudinal resonance frequency. This yields a resonance that forces the bullet to have minimum change in velocity over a very slight load change.
Or, if you don't use a tuner as I do, you would test for group size instead of ES.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,275
Messages
2,215,669
Members
79,518
Latest member
DixieDog
Back
Top