I have measured the base to shoulder and all case were within.001 or I bumped them back to where they were before loading. As I mentioned I am developing a load using what was new Lapua brass. The issue was only noticed when I was reloading these. The first time I didn't bother to measure every CBTO, I assumed once the seater was set all would be the same. Now I know to not "assume".
Two things keep resized case headspace to a minimum spread:
- Uniformly lube all cases so,each has the same amount all over. I like to use a 50-50 mix of STP engine oil treatment and Hoppe's No 9 bore cleaner, several drops in a large coffee can lined with foam then put in 50 cases. Tumble them in a Thumblers Tumbler while full length sizing an earlier batch of lubed ones.
A .002" spread in case headspace is very good.
- Use a Redding competition shell holder the right height above the .125" standard then set the die to let it stop against the die bottom with the ram topped out gently camming over. Keep it up for 3 to 4 seconds to let press springback pull the die down that last thousandth from where it pushed up sizing the case. Bump case shoulders back .002"; .001" if their headspace spread after sizing is less than .001" and the rifle's bolt face is squared up right.
A few thousandths spread is good enough to shoot sub MOA groups at 1000 yards. Remember the chamber throat erodes away down the barrel .001" for every half to few dozen rounds fired depending on charge weight and bore diameter. Are you going to adjust bullet seating depth that often?This dang seating depth is whats driving me nuts
Same here. I check every round. My press doesn't cam over. I set the die so usually it will be .001-.002" long when I just feel it bottom out, then I can give it a slight bit more pressure and get it right. If I go over I pull them back a bit and reset. I don't think my collet die does anything to the surface of the bullet and I only have to use minimal clamping force on it. If you are worried about neck tension or bullet damage, an impact puller would not cause any runout or tension issues I could thing of. Just a couple light taps to move the bullet maybe .005" and reseat. Pulling them clear out and reseating does seem to lessen neck tension.In my hands, setting the seating die micrometer so that some of the loaded rounds will give you the desired measurement on the first light stroke of the press and the rest will be seated .005" to .001" long has worked best. I measure every loaded round after seating and even on my best days, the variance may be as high as .002" to .003" after the first stroke. That's why I set the mic to seat bullets at no more than the desired seating depth or just a tick long. I can always put a round back in the press and barely touch it again to get it where I want, but if it's too short, I don't ever try to pull it and start over. Too much chance for upsetting neck tension or damaging the surface of the bullet.
It doesn't. You could pull & reseat new bullets in a neck (a thousand times) and it would not affect tension at all.Pulling them clear out and reseating does seem to lessen neck tension.
What dial indicator range does the BGC tool uses or could it use any based on the precision you're looking for? i.e. 0.05"range x 0.0001" or 1.0" x 0.001" etc.... trying to learn more about the tool and if i need to purchase another dial indicator. What do you use?
Thank you for the reply.The dial indicator that came with mine is 0.02" X 0.0001". Attached is a picture.
Ken
View attachment 1016795
Would checking the bullet ogive radius with the bob green custom ogive comparator offer more uniform meplat BEFORE Bullet Trim and Pointing Process.Regardless of merchandising or misunderstandings, the BGC does not establish consistent CBTO. That's not what it's for.
The BGC is purely for comparative measure of ogive radius variances.
Once you've established bullet groups matching in ogive radius, i.e. qualified your datums, further measures like CBTO become credible.
But you still have to measure CBTO for every round loaded to establish matching CBTO(which is affected by seating forces).
Keep in mind also that a given CBTO is usually taken from a point different than actual land contact, which is affected by throat angle to ogive angles,, not just diameters. And bearing does not begin anywhere near land contact.
There is also a gualifying measure prior to ogive radius comparison with a BGC. That is, bullet diameter at bearing end/ogive begin. Without considering this, you could match ogives with bullets that don't actually have matching ogives. That doesn't change CBTO directly, but it would affect meplat trimming taken from a high ogive datum.
Meplats should always be trimmed from ogives to obtain same meplat diameters,, not from bases merely to get same OAL..
It would if your meplat tools take datum off the nose (like Hoover).Would checking the bullet ogive radius with the bob green custom ogive comparator offer more uniform meplat BEFORE Bullet Trim and Pointing Process.
Thanks for info,It would if your meplat tools take datum off the nose (like Hoover).
It would not if acting w/resp to bullet base (like Whidden).