First of all, if you are not piercing primers what you have is more of an aesthetic problem. Secondly, you can get a crater from the combination of a soft cup, a light spring, and the shape of the pin tip. It can be a combination of factors. The pressure in the primer pocked during firing can back the pin up a bit. If this moves the full diameter of the pin below the edge of the hole that creates a space for the primer cup to be moved into. On the 6 1/2 primers...they were not designed for any more pressure than a .22 Hornet. When Remington came out with the .222 they found that the 6 1/2s were not up to the pressure of the new cartridge, which was the first small primer high pressure round, so they came out with a tougher primer, the 7 1/2. It has a thicker cup. After that pretty much all of the small rifle primers that I can think of had thick enough cups for the higher pressure cartridges. I would guess that the reason that Remington still makes the 6 1/2s is that there are some older hammer type rifles out there in Hornet that do not have as much striker energy as modern rifles, and with a case that small, a milder primer works better. If it were my rifle, given the chamfer shown on the edge of the firing pin hole, as the others have suggested, I would send it off to Greg Tannel to be bushed. On the firing pint tip shape, years ago a very experienced shooter told met that the correct shape is not a hemisphere but rather more flattened in the center. That a proper shape has two radii, a smaller one at the edge and a larger one in the center.
Decades ago, I did a severe overload in a rifle that had a very sharp edged striker hole, a very heavy firing pin that fit the hole well, and a very strong striker spring. Although the primer fell out of the case when I opened the bolt, it had no crater.
As others have said, based on the edges of the fired primers in your initial picture, the load was not a hot one.