Ccrider
Gold $$ Contributor
My continued prayers are made for the families in Uvalde.
As those that cherish our right to bear arms, we should feel obligated to provide a proper rational response to addressing this tragedy. It is appalling to here the number of people calling to ban guns as a fix for this situation. This claim is nothing more than a useless and irrational appeal to emotion. Yet, we have to be careful and empathetic in how we respond.
First, it is impossible to disarm the citizens in our country from guns that they legally purchased and own. Second, mentally ill, sick or evil people will do the unthinkable or evil acts, whether by use of guns, bombs, cars, or any other means they choose to use. Taking law abiding citizen’s guns will not change this fact.
We should redirect this conversation to focus on what we as a society are doing to deal with these sick or evil people. Clearly, we have to do more.
And, pointing the finger at the police for not running in fast enough is short sited. Truth is that we do not properly select and train our law enforcement servants to deal with this situation. Not every person is cut out to charge head first into an active shooter situation and take on gunfire. (Being on the SWAT or TAC team does not change this fact.) It is all too easy to criticize those that don’t, when we do not do due diligence to get the answer to this question before the time of truth. In addition to not properly selecting or training our law enforcement personnel, we do not pay the ones that we are asking to do this fair wages. One would have to be a fool to expect any different response with this type of inadequate preparation. (I was actually thinking piss poor half ass preparation.)
Yet, if we as law abiding citizens do not properly direct the focus, we will continue to hear the and reap the consequences of the irrational appeal to emotion, “if the assault weapons ban had continued, and we get rid of these guns, then all of these killings would not be happening.”
As those that cherish our right to bear arms, we should feel obligated to provide a proper rational response to addressing this tragedy. It is appalling to here the number of people calling to ban guns as a fix for this situation. This claim is nothing more than a useless and irrational appeal to emotion. Yet, we have to be careful and empathetic in how we respond.
First, it is impossible to disarm the citizens in our country from guns that they legally purchased and own. Second, mentally ill, sick or evil people will do the unthinkable or evil acts, whether by use of guns, bombs, cars, or any other means they choose to use. Taking law abiding citizen’s guns will not change this fact.
We should redirect this conversation to focus on what we as a society are doing to deal with these sick or evil people. Clearly, we have to do more.
And, pointing the finger at the police for not running in fast enough is short sited. Truth is that we do not properly select and train our law enforcement servants to deal with this situation. Not every person is cut out to charge head first into an active shooter situation and take on gunfire. (Being on the SWAT or TAC team does not change this fact.) It is all too easy to criticize those that don’t, when we do not do due diligence to get the answer to this question before the time of truth. In addition to not properly selecting or training our law enforcement personnel, we do not pay the ones that we are asking to do this fair wages. One would have to be a fool to expect any different response with this type of inadequate preparation. (I was actually thinking piss poor half ass preparation.)
Yet, if we as law abiding citizens do not properly direct the focus, we will continue to hear the and reap the consequences of the irrational appeal to emotion, “if the assault weapons ban had continued, and we get rid of these guns, then all of these killings would not be happening.”