kerdunk
Silver $$ Contributor
I have been encouraged to purchase a SilencerCo Omega 300 for my hunting rifle. I trust this recommendation, so I really do not want to create a debate about that choice necessarily. But I am curious to know if anyone has a strong opinion on Direct Mount vs Plan B. It will be a dedicated suppressor on a 300 Win Mag. I envision removing the suppressor for transport (to save length) and for cleaning/storage.
I am wondering if the Plan B offers a benefit over Direct Mount from the perspective of potential thread damage during removal/install cycles.
And I am curious if anyone has experienced changes to their zero as a result of removal/install cycles.
Finally, should I consider any type of anti-seize lubricant for the suppressor to rifle interface. I am hoping that hand-tight provides sufficient torque at install.
As always, I appreciate any insights.
I am wondering if the Plan B offers a benefit over Direct Mount from the perspective of potential thread damage during removal/install cycles.
And I am curious if anyone has experienced changes to their zero as a result of removal/install cycles.
Finally, should I consider any type of anti-seize lubricant for the suppressor to rifle interface. I am hoping that hand-tight provides sufficient torque at install.
As always, I appreciate any insights.









