Jeff Porter
Gold $$ Contributor
Why?THIS.
I'd go a step further and say that any CMP-compliant Service Rifle should count as a Palma rifle.
Why?THIS.
I'd go a step further and say that any CMP-compliant Service Rifle should count as a Palma rifle.
NRA says it does.THIS.
I'd go a step further and say that any CMP-compliant Service Rifle should count as a Palma rifle.
It expands what matches your Service Rifle crew can shoot with existing gear, and grows your potential match attendance pool.Why?
Right, my proposal would remove the "with metallic sights" clause and let them roll with their SR-compliant scopes.NRA says it does.
3.3.1 U.S. Palma Rifle—
(a) A rifle with metallic sights chambered for the unmodified .308/7.62 or .223/5.56 NATO cartridge case.
(b) Any service rifle with metallic sights chambered for the unmodified .308/7.62 NATO or .223/5.56 NATO cartridge case. 3.4 Reduced Capacity Magazine––In slow fire, auto rifles using an
The scoped Palma/service rifle becomes the slippery slope that brings the question: If the service rifle can shoot with a scope, why can't my match rifle use one as well.It expands what matches your Service Rifle crew can shoot with existing gear, and grows your potential match attendance pool.
On the "fair to the other competitors" side: Service Rifle still has the same caliber restrictions as Palma, and much of the benefit a scope brings is countered by the rules around sling attachment (to both rifle and shooter), rifle adjustments, and barrel length.
Right, my proposal would remove the "with metallic sights" clause and let them roll with their SR-compliant scopes.
Yeah, I covered that. Yes you have a scope, but you also have a stubby barrel, 2 stock adjustments (sling tension and LOP), and no handstop. You're also disadvantaged by the allowed sling-to-jacket attachment.The scoped Palma/service rifle becomes the slippery slope that brings the question: If the service rifle can shoot with a scope, why can't my match rifle use one as well.
I don't agree with letting service rifle with optics in with Palma. That's not Palma in my opinion.Right, my proposal would remove the "with metallic sights" clause and let them roll with their SR-compliant scopes.
But what do these shooters do when the match mandates you have to shoot the Palma day to be part of the overall Agg? If they only have one Any rifle then they have to be the Optics only or stay home.Many shooters have only one Any/Rifle and change from irons to scope to match the corse of fire. Also an Any rifle with irons is legal in an Any/Any match. Hence the term “Any”.
So which do you want: more shooters on the line, or clinging to requiring a Palma rifle because "well that's how we've always done it"? 'cause right now those two goals are going to run counter to one another.In order to remain compliant with the rest of the world Palma needs to remain Palma. Why do you want to shoot your service rifle in Palma when the across the course matches are almost gone in our area because of lack of shooters. If you want to shoot Palma buy a Palma rifle, if you want to shoot service rifle buy a service rifle. The US takes an International butt kicking every 4 years now because our rifle competition classes are so bastardized! Nearly 800 shooters in the Bisley Championships last week vs. less than 50 at our NRA National long range matches.
Never?never crossfired
How can you tell if an Any is using iron or optic sights?If you look at the results form this past SWN. Look at the Optics class scores & compare them to the Any rifle scores. If the Any people would have been able to shoot Any all the way through that would be a very competitive class when combining Any & Optics. And a much bigger class.