jelenko
Gold $$ Contributor
To me, it seems more like the people who compete in benchrest are intuitively responding with what they know and what is important to what they do. I don't feel it's 'snobbery' - if anything more just forgetting that what is critical to their success may be more than is needed in another discipline.Well said. That is EXACTLY what happens. A guy asks a question, and 20 posts later nothing short of winning the nationals at a bench rest competition will be considered "accuracy". The snobbery is palpable (and that's what it is). I have seen literally HUNDREDS of these threads devolve EXACTLY like that, and so have my friends... It is real thing.
I compete in 'XTC' where a rifle/ammo that shoots even some 1/2 MOA groups - with anything over a 1" group being very rare - is enough to win Nationals. While there is absolutely nothing wrong per se with working on improving my gun/ammo's accuracy, I do know it won't make a difference in my scores.
Further 'away' from the accuracy demands of benchrest would be three gun competition. I haven't competed in 3 gun and don't know anyone who has, but from my understanding of their courses of firing, a 1 MOA gun is fine.
Going back the other way, my perception is there are a lot of readers here that don't participate in formal competition but are motivated to get their rifle/ammo as accurate as possible. Many probably like the detail and care that is involved along with the experimenting. For these shooters, I would think the advice of top level benchrest shooters would be highly valued.









