been loading for my 6.5 CM lately, using the 140ELD, 142 SMK 140 SMK, and some other 130 and 123gr bullets, using H4350. over the chrony i am seeing approx 20 and up fps variances, will it take another powder to see if i can better these numbers, tried different neck tensions OAL ect.
chet
The chronograph you use makes a big difference too. I had a cheap one and it gave me fits with extreme spread. Numbers just didn’t make sense for the amount of effort and attention to detail I was putting in. Bought a magnetospeed and shot over a Labradar and the numbers make more sense. Group is the most important. Don’t get too hung up on the numbers. I watched one of my friends shoot a 200-18x at 600 yards on an F-class target and the extreme spread was around 23fps for 20 shots. Trying to chase numbers with any of them will take years off your life.been loading for my 6.5 CM lately, using the 140ELD, 142 SMK 140 SMK, and some other 130 and 123gr bullets, using H4350. over the chrony i am seeing approx 20 and up fps variances, will it take another powder to see if i can better these numbers, tried different neck tensions OAL ect.
chet
If you are testing that many bullets, I don't know how you can gather any hard data. Pick one you think you may like and make it work.been loading for my 6.5 CM lately, using the 140ELD, 142 SMK 140 SMK, and some other 130 and 123gr bullets, using H4350. over the chrony i am seeing approx 20 and up fps variances, will it take another powder to see if i can better these numbers, tried different neck tensions OAL ect.
chet
I'd tweak a few things first, neck tension, seat depths etc.. But if you want to switch powders, RL 16 the closest to H4350. RL 17(good) but different beast.curious if anyone is having better luck with other powders, just tried Superformance, not thrilled, any alliant powders worth a try, rl16, rl17 ect i am mainly shooting the 140 SMK with best luck so far using 41.8 h4350
chet
Please explain, "Groups at half range will have greater angular spreads so the tuner can be adjusted for best drop compensation at that range".If bullets leave the muzzle axis on its upswing at the right place, slower ones will leave at a higher angle from the LOS compensating for their greater drop at target range.
Weights on the muzzle adjust back and forth to "tune" the muzzle axis ertical vibration frequency to make that happen. Groups at half range will have greater angular spreads so the tuner can be adjusted for best drop compensation at that range.
Post 12 had the answer.Please explain, "Groups at half range will have greater angular spreads so the tuner can be adjusted for best drop compensation at that range".
I think hes saying that half way to the convergence point (target) will be the largest divergence /the highest point has the largest gap between fast and slow. Thanks, I understand positive compensation, it was just not clear that was what Bart B. was referring too. All is well.
![]()
Adjusting the tuner can move harmonics so that the convergence point is where you want it to be instead of just the distance it was previously set up for.
I understand "positive compensation". It was not clear to me that was what you were saying. All is well.Post 12 had the answer.
People have been observing this since the early 1900's or sooner.
http://www.geoffrey-kolbe.com/articles/rimfire_accuracy/tuning_a_barrel.htm
Chech out the link to Al Harral's website then click on tuners' for details.
been loading for my 6.5 CM lately, using the 140ELD, 142 SMK 140 SMK, and some other 130 and 123gr bullets, using H4350. over the chrony i am seeing approx 20 and up fps variances, will it take another powder to see if i can better these numbers, tried different neck tensions OAL ect.
chet