Looks like if you do any testing from now on you will need to get the results approved.
What exatly " optical performance" is is sketchy at best. Good glass is more expensive than less good glass, flurite or ED glass ain't cheap.
That said, lots of folks are missing the distinction between premium scopes and their lesser brethern.....that is the most important thing you pay for.......the absolute ability to hold POI over time.
Looks like if you do any testing from now on you will need to get the results approved.
It is not as apparent (you don't see it when you look thru the glass) but scopes with same quality glass are not all created equal. Mechanical quality is just as, if not more, important.
I was following closely also as I am in the market for another scope and considered the info informative.I was following that test post closely, yet I must have missed something? I thought it was one of the best posts on here. Sure beats page after page chasing around one twentieth of one percent electronic scale drift.
I was following closely also as I am in the market for another scope and considered the info informative.
My bad. I was wrong with my original title. I still think it would have been easier to give the reason. Case closed.
Please delete this one too.
I asked it to be pulled. It was heading the wrong way and was going to end bad. The point is to get YOU testing scopes too.
I'll do more testing in the future and will post it. But my testing only proves if the scopes in my hands hold poi. It does not prove if yours do. There looks like there will be a couple guys bringing back the scope testers. I consider it an absolute necessity at this point. No, I will not profit in any way from scope tester sales FYI.
Its so easy to do all you need is 100 yards and a mirage free day.
I think common use of bore scopes may not be the best thing lol. I will not look in my personal barrels with one.All of this reminds me of when bore scopes started to come into common use.