Monty
I don't think I'm making it any more difficult than it is? But you are mixing part of one sentence with another and ignoring parts you find it convenient to ignore.
The 2" rule applies to "rests" but if you want to apply it to a bipod you would have to apply the "two inches on a given side" part of the rule. Thus "Separate flat boards and or plates not exceeding the dimensions of the individual rests by two inches on a given side" could only exceed the dimensions of the bipod by 2" side to side AND front to back. By your view of the rules you could even interpret the rule to imply a small board under each foot of the bipod.
Craig
The bipod rule simply states as wide as necessary and no more than 12" front to back.
I don't think I'm making it any more difficult than it is? But you are mixing part of one sentence with another and ignoring parts you find it convenient to ignore.
The 2" rule applies to "rests" but if you want to apply it to a bipod you would have to apply the "two inches on a given side" part of the rule. Thus "Separate flat boards and or plates not exceeding the dimensions of the individual rests by two inches on a given side" could only exceed the dimensions of the bipod by 2" side to side AND front to back. By your view of the rules you could even interpret the rule to imply a small board under each foot of the bipod.
Craig
The bipod rule simply states as wide as necessary and no more than 12" front to back.
Wrong. The way the language is intended, and most commonly interpreted by match directors, referees, etc. is no more than 12 inches deep, front to back, and as wide as necessary for the bipod at its max width, plus two inches on each side so the dang thing isn't slipping off every couple shots.
Stop making this harder than it needs to be.