Agree with the first part. I've tried it and you reach max case capacity before achieving any significant velocity gains. But I have played with it a little more in a 260 w/130 Bergers and had some success. At max capacity, I am picking up about 100 fps compared to my H4350 load, and QL shows lower pressure. The accuracy with RL26 isn't quite as good as with H4350, but close enough for me (PRS). I think it would be worth giving a shot in a 6.5CM.Not enough case capacity, doubt it would work in 6.5 creed either.
Agree with the first part. I've tried it and you reach max case capacity before achieving any significant velocity gains. But I have played with it a little more in a 260 w/130 Bergers and had some success. At max capacity, I am picking up about 100 fps compared to my H4350 load, and QL shows lower pressure. The accuracy with RL26 isn't quite as good as with H4350, but close enough for me (PRS). I think it would be worth giving a shot in a 6.5CM.
RL 23 will work in a 6.5 creed, I've never read where a powder as slow as H4831 has done anyone any good in the creed, slowing down to RL26 seems a waste of time to me.Agree with the first part. I've tried it and you reach max case capacity before achieving any significant velocity gains. But I have played with it a little more in a 260 w/130 Bergers and had some success. At max capacity, I am picking up about 100 fps compared to my H4350 load, and QL shows lower pressure. The accuracy with RL26 isn't quite as good as with H4350, but close enough for me (PRS). I think it would be worth giving a shot in a 6.5CM.
Case capacity on a 260 and 6.5 CM are almost identical. I wouldn't have guessed a slow powder would give these results either, but QL threw it out as an option, and I gave it a shot. I'm getting 2930 fps w/H350, and 3060 fps w/RL26. The design of the RL26 kernels give you a more efficient case fill, so you can get more in than you think.RL 23 will work in a 6.5 creed, I've never read where a powder as slow as H4831 has done anyone any good in the creed, slowing down to RL26 seems a waste of time to me.
Really can't compare case capacity of a 260 to the creed neither.
There was a rabbit hole that needed checked out, lolCase capacity on a 260 and 6.5 CM are almost identical. I wouldn't have guessed a slow powder would give these results either, but QL threw it out as an option, and I gave it a shot. I'm getting 2930 fps w/H350, and 3060 fps w/RL26. The design of the RL26 kernels give you a more efficient case fill, so you can get more in than you think.
The OP asked about 6x47L anyway, not sure how we got on the 6.5CM??
Case capacity on a 260 and 6.5 CM are almost identical. I wouldn't have guessed a slow powder would give these results either, but QL threw it out as an option, and I gave it a shot. I'm getting 2930 fps w/H350, and 3060 fps w/RL26. The design of the RL26 kernels give you a more efficient case fill, so you can get more in than you think.
The OP asked about 6x47L anyway, not sure how we got on the 6.5CM??
Did you see a bit of smoke burn out the barrel like a black powder rifle?Case capacity on a 260 and 6.5 CM are almost identical. I wouldn't have guessed a slow powder would give these results either, but QL threw it out as an option, and I gave it a shot. I'm getting 2930 fps w/H350, and 3060 fps w/RL26. The design of the RL26 kernels give you a more efficient case fill, so you can get more in than you think.
The OP asked about 6x47L anyway, not sure how we got on the 6.5CM??
I've seen some good info on RL26 in the 6CompMatch by Chad Dixon and the 6.5Gap 4s by George Gardner. Has anyone worked with RL26 in the 6L?
Why does everyone feel like RL 26 is some magical powder, I bought 30lbs of it when it first came out, wasn't for me.
Haha, I bought 30lbs of it when it first came out, it was so magical that when exposed to air a few times my 7 saum gained 100fps from when new, I hope they got that ironed out.It is a "magical" powder due to its innovative chemistry, but only when used in an appropriate application. That would mean a case considerably larger than X47L or XC.