Whats the general feedback on being worth the purchase on this action. Seems like a good way to build a decent benchrest 22. Would it be any better than building off a CZ action? Of course, "you get what you pay for" comes to mind also.......
I expected to hear this. And respect the opinion. My gut feeling is with a good barrel and trigger this would meet my "wants" for a while. It's my hopes it would be a step up from the factory CZ457 I'm shooting now. Thats the mystery/risk that prompted this post. Given my location, being a competitor is tough. Minimum 2 1/2 hours to play in some ARA matches. And I'm to dang old and broke down for the gymnastics involved in rimfire PRS or NRL22.Spend the money wisely and get a 2500x.
PTG has a less than stellar reputation for customer service…..
Wow....that's pretty sadThis is from a new ptg lonestar a friend bought a few months back. I my opinion this is unacceptable.
Thats my understandingMy Lonestar 2500 was made by Stiller. is the Lonestar everyone is talking about here m manufactured by PTG now?
Wow... That bolt does not look a couple of months old. Looks like someone took a chisel to the inside and outside extractor slots. Both of the ones I bought are much smoother and well machined.
YesMy Lonestar 2500 was made by Stiller. is the Lonestar everyone is talking about here m manufactured by PTG now?
That's certainly a good route to take. Have to give it some thoughtTest fired the rifle today, it’s a repeater. Going to try it with a l3i magazine and see if that helps. It fed okay with vudoo polymer magazines but would shave lead off the bullet underneath the one it picks up out of the mag. Il deburr the bolt an see if that helps as well. Had to cut the extractor slots to almost a knife edge to the chamber and now it extracts reliably. Little clunky to run. Also I don’t believe you want to dry fire this action, firing pin seems to hit the breech face. There is around .004/.005 clearance from bolt nose to breech face for .043” headspace.
Barrel was a 1.25” CRB 16t
Accuracy is good with multiple sk ammo types.
Overall I think with some work and magazine modifications it can be decent. However for the money it’s tough to beat the barreled action b14r offering.
I took my LoneStar bolt apart today and looked at it with the firing pin removed. It looks just like yours, being pretty rough. Not as rough as yours though. I suspect that this area that is visible with the firing pin removed must basically be a no contact, non load bearing area and therefore does not need a fine machine finish. For comparison, I took apart my 1956 Remington 40X bolt apart and it is the same. Evidently they just hog out this area.This is from a new ptg lonestar a friend bought a few months back. I my opinion this is unacceptable.
