Not sure the pres has talked about “changing the language of the 14th amendment”, more like getting to the actual original intent and meaning of the part about “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” is what needs to be hashed out and plenty of people way smarter than me are of the belief this is what disqualifies the “anchor babies “Yes I'm on board. It's not being repealed but the Pres talked about changing the language in the 14th amendment in an interview so it clearly states illegal immigrants that cross the border and have children exempts them from being US citizens. That's what I'm talking about. It's obviously an act that would be scamming the system but the 14th amendment doesn't specifically state that precise language. Like you said, the anchor baby theory. At this point only means the baby is American and parents and family must be deported back across the border. Course to the left, that's inhumane. Don't worry about all the crime, rapes and deaths created by the illegal criminals. Separating illegals from their mom's tops the inhumane definition apparently. I think it'll get worked out by the current admin but I don't want to see any amendments adjusted or changed. It opens up too much BS for future leaders to do the same. I'm out on this thread. Too political at this point. Shoot straight.