dellet
Gold $$ Contributor
There are a lot of people that shoot cast bullets, black powder cartridges with smokeless powder that absolutely believe indexing the case and or bullet for each shot noticeably reduce group size.
Other than primer and firing pin location a 22LR is no different, with the exception of not being able to use the same case to prove the point. You still have a long straight walled case with low density powder charge, with a primer over the charge similar to a 12 o’clock firing pin.
Lots of debate over using wads to hold the powder in place and if so where to place it. On the powder, at the case mouth or how far off the powder.
I have tried indexing a case and recording shots, much like you would for checking tracking on a scope and believe it has merit. A wild card is my ability at casting bullets. I have enough other issues to blame before position of the case in the chamber can be eliminated.
I also think that sorting rimfire ammo has a lot of potential. I started doing that with 22 shorts, simply because there really isn’t a choice for ammo. You take what you can get.
Sorting by rim thickness and then base to ogive has helped reduce group size and eliminate flyers.
Using a chronograph proves that SD/ES numbers can be terrible, and out of my control.
The Stowaway has posted many video clips of other trouble spots to worry about. All the things center fire shooters can control. Case consistency, bullet shape and loaded runout, rim runout thing you can’t control other than setting the round aside. Many things that may cause a flyer, but until you can shoot that case repeatedly, you won’t be able to prove the case is the problem.
Trying different lots of ammo until you find something that shoots well is no more than bulk sorting. It would be interesting to compare cartridges from different lots that have shot well in the same rifle and record the measurements and then try to find another lot by comparison, instead of by target results. I think that might prove once and for all if sorting has merit.
I think sorting is basically summed up as after the factory quality control. Your results will reflect your ability to spot problems against the ability of the person or machine at the factory.
I have also hadn’t a couple rifles that didn’t seem to respond to any ammo and either get shot for pure fun or went down the road.
No magic answers from me, maybe some things to think about. I think the comparison of rimfire to the shooters in the Schuetzen game and what they do to reduce group size is worth a look.
Other than primer and firing pin location a 22LR is no different, with the exception of not being able to use the same case to prove the point. You still have a long straight walled case with low density powder charge, with a primer over the charge similar to a 12 o’clock firing pin.
Lots of debate over using wads to hold the powder in place and if so where to place it. On the powder, at the case mouth or how far off the powder.
I have tried indexing a case and recording shots, much like you would for checking tracking on a scope and believe it has merit. A wild card is my ability at casting bullets. I have enough other issues to blame before position of the case in the chamber can be eliminated.
I also think that sorting rimfire ammo has a lot of potential. I started doing that with 22 shorts, simply because there really isn’t a choice for ammo. You take what you can get.
Sorting by rim thickness and then base to ogive has helped reduce group size and eliminate flyers.
Using a chronograph proves that SD/ES numbers can be terrible, and out of my control.
The Stowaway has posted many video clips of other trouble spots to worry about. All the things center fire shooters can control. Case consistency, bullet shape and loaded runout, rim runout thing you can’t control other than setting the round aside. Many things that may cause a flyer, but until you can shoot that case repeatedly, you won’t be able to prove the case is the problem.
Trying different lots of ammo until you find something that shoots well is no more than bulk sorting. It would be interesting to compare cartridges from different lots that have shot well in the same rifle and record the measurements and then try to find another lot by comparison, instead of by target results. I think that might prove once and for all if sorting has merit.
I think sorting is basically summed up as after the factory quality control. Your results will reflect your ability to spot problems against the ability of the person or machine at the factory.
I have also hadn’t a couple rifles that didn’t seem to respond to any ammo and either get shot for pure fun or went down the road.
No magic answers from me, maybe some things to think about. I think the comparison of rimfire to the shooters in the Schuetzen game and what they do to reduce group size is worth a look.
















