• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

New Garmin?

Hey Fellers, been reading everything that I can find online about the new C2 and cannot find out if the handgun setting will allow 0 to 5000 fps like they say or they break it up around 1700 like they do on the on the C1. I've been doing a lot of handgun caliber carbine testing between 12 and 24 hundred fps and the Ç1 drives me nuts having to go from handgun to rifle at 1700 because a lot of the rifle cartridges live right in the middle of the range. My number two son borrowed my C1 last week (which means I have probably seen the last of it) and was thinking about replacing it with the C2, IF it will work in the handgun mode up to at least 2500fps, if not I'll just get another C1 because it's perfect except for the break at 1700....... John
 
Interesting. I would have thought they'd endeavour to address some of the shortcomings of the 'old' one. For example, calculation of ballistic coefficient, micro SD card to make data transfer easier. I'm still leaning towards the LabRadar LX.
 
copied post from the folks at Applied Ballistics regarding BC numbers generated at short distances (i.e. 100yds or less) :

--------------
BCs calculated at such a short range are neither really representative nor especially useful from a physics standpoint.

Drag models assume steady-state flow and velocity-dependent drag behavior, but at very short distances the projectile is still transitioning through complex aerodynamic regimes (muzzle blast interaction, yaw of repose settling, transient Mach effects, etc.). Small measurement errors in velocity over a short baseline also get amplified when back-calculating BC, which can make the result look precise while actually being less accurate.

Short-range measurements are still very useful for true muzzle velocity and consistency they’re just not ideal for meaningful BC determination, and can lead to bad ballistic predictions if the shortcomings are not fully understood. They are very popular for marketing reasons, but their is a reason you are much better off using long range averaged BCs and even some companies that market their short range BCs on the box publish the long range BCs for ballistic predictions on their website.

{ original post and context here }
---------------
 
  • Like
Reactions: SGK
Recent updates to the Garmin C1, and continued with the C2 allow you to use two chronos to generate meaningful BC's for input into your ballistic solver to generate accurate range cards.

 
  • Like
Reactions: SGK
Recent updates to the Garmin C1, and continued with the C2 allow you to use two chronos to generate meaningful BC's for input into your ballistic solver to generate accurate range cards.

Two Garmins…. $$$
If your buddy will join you do you have to flip a coin to see which of you will be putting your Garmin down range..??
It will be a very expensive day with a misplaced shot…
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,564
Messages
2,258,279
Members
81,389
Latest member
thomasled8929
Back
Top