Try the 62 gr. Barnes for deer.50grn v-max does great for me with Varget. Not sure on a deer bullet yet, im still working on that.
Maybe on the next barrel. But for now I'm stuck with a 1-14 twist.Try the 62 gr. Barnes for deer.
I honestly have no idea why Remington put the speed bump in the forends of those stocks matter fact I don't have any idea why Remington does a lot of things they do seems like they're always trying to reinvent the wheel. As far as cleaning the glue out of the triggers I've always just used a dental pick and some solventC.E. I just cleaned and re-scoped a family members old model 700 .243. It had that forend speed bump. First time I ever saw it, was that Remington's attempt at a cheap bedding job? Also to adjust those old triggers, what's the best product to remove the glue that sets the adjustment screws. Thanks
Oops - yeah, that'll never work in a 1:14.Maybe on the next barrel. But for now I'm stuck with a 1-14 twist.
Heres where i would start, sand down the speed bump in the forend if it has it, bed it, adjust trigger. Then get a pound of IMR 4064 and 52gr Sierra MatchKings. If this doesnt shoot, throw the gun away.
I agree, my latest journey was a LVSF in 223. Once i did the work i mentioned that thing was a shooter beyond belief, but right out of the box it was sadly disappointing.I've owned a bunch of Rem 700 and Model 7's and except for the varmint heavy barreled rifle they all had those 'speed bumps' you refer to. None of them would shoot very well until I removed them and free floated the barrel. Some required pillar bedding the junk stock but eventually I got them all to shoot.
Sierra 52 hp over IMR 4064. I don't recommend this caliber for use with harvesting a whitetail but that is just my opinion. If I absolutely had to use it for deer I would be looking at the Barnes bullets. I have had very good luck in my hunting rifles with the Barnes tsx/ttsx.
Nick
C.E. I just cleaned and re-scoped a family members old model 700 .243. It had that forend speed bump. First time I ever saw it, was that Remington's attempt at a cheap bedding job? Also to adjust those old triggers, what's the best product to remove the glue that sets the adjustment screws. Thanks
It is my firm opinion that removing the hump in Remington stocks is a mistake. I'll stick my neck out and call it BS.
Without fail, every factory rifle I've had floated and bedded either shot the same as it did prior to relieving the fore end or it shot better. Never worse, but my sample size is small. I'm only talking about a half dozen guns, so I'd be interested in hearing others experiences in regards to this.
In general, it's hard to go wrong with a free float, bed and trigger job IMO. Those three things have saved the day on more than one occasion for me. Sometimes the results have been so dramatic that the gun went from the outhouse to the penthouse. Other times, it didn't make a hill of beans difference because the problem was elsewhere.
If I was the OP, I'd shoot the gun first and see how it performs before performing surgery. There is always time for remedial action. Easier to remove material than put it back!
t is my firm opinion that removing the hump in Remington stocks is a mistake. I'll stick my neck out and call it BS.
Nor do I, thanks.I don't want to get into a pissing contest and I do not dispute your results. My results were different with two Rem Model 7's and three Rem Model 700. Both Browning and Tikka free float their barrels. A custom gun maker shoots at my club. He specializes in light weight big game rifles and all his rifles are free floated. True he pillar beds them but he told me that pressure points at the end of the stock is an obsolete technology. Still it makes sense on a new rifle to test it first before you make any modifications. But if you can't get to shoot removing those "speed bumps" might solve the problem. It did for me but I did have to pillar bed one of the 700's to get it to shoot well after I removed the speed bumps.
One of the point, the Bell and Carlson Model 7 stocks are all free floated.