AlNyhus said:Tozguy said:Al, is neck turning a necessity to get good results from a bushing die?
Well....think of it this way: The hole in the neck bushing is perfectly round. What happens when you push a neck that's not round (due to wall thickness inconsistencies, etc.) into a round hole? The sized neck will now be round on the outside but not round on the inside...the inconsistent thickness has to go somewhere. Now, before someone puts my feet to the fire and points out (correctly) that a fired case neck is perfectly round (or at least as round as the neck area of the chamber is)....that would be correct. But the inconsistency is still inside the neck.
One of the major components to accuracy is geting the seated bullet so that it enters the rifling in as exact a manner as possible....how is this going to happen with a bullet that's already off axis relative to the throat?
I'm not going to hazard a guess as to how much neck thickness variance you need to have before the use of a bushing type die either negates any benefits or even makes thngs worse. I just know what I've found in my own a-b-a testing with my competition rigs as well as my factory and custom barrelled hunting stuff, is all. Much of this has to do with the throat diameter (how much over the bullet shank diameter the throat is), the lead angle of the throat, how the case is sized relative to shoulder 'bump' and how much the shoulder/body angle is reduced in diameter in the sizing process.
Tozguy said:What don't you like about a micrometer top seater? My measurements have shown that the micrometer is 100% reliable and repeatable.
I didn't write that I don't like micrometer tops. What I wrote was: "I strongly suggest a standard, non-micrometer top, non-stainless Wilson seater."
Good shootin'.-Al
Al, thanks for the reply. I apologize if I put words in your mouth. I'm not trying to prove anything, just to learn. Still would like to know why you strongly suggested what you did.