LC is fine brass,I doubt Lapua brass is the magic he is looking for .Seating depth would be my first thing to experiment with. 77s at 2.260" is an AR mag-length round...that's a long bullet and will probably shoot better seated out longer.Maybe consider switching to Lapua brass. I would guess it would be way more consistent than LC.
Because I saw significant improvement in accuracy when I switched from Lc brass to Lapua in my 223. Lc brass is not as consistent as Lapua, primer pockets were more consistent, ND was more consistent. I would take a guess that would have a potential impact in better accuracy and groupings.Why would you think that is the magic he needs without any real info ?
Were you shooting 2" groups with a varmint rifle at 300 yards when you saw the big improvement ? Was it range brass or new brass ?Because I saw significant improvement in accuracy when I switched from Lc brass to Lapua in my 223. Lc brass is not as consistent as Lapua, primer pockets were more consistent, ND was more consistent. I would take a guess that would have a potential impact in better accuracy and groupings.
if you're not neck turning, I'd say that's your problem. Uneven neck tension. Are you using a bushing die?The powder charge was worked up and this is the best I could get. I even tried different powders and RL 15 came out the best groups. Taking your advice I will work with the seating depth.
Slightly better, I don’t remember define number but I do know seating consistency and concentricity improved. Point being I found my rifle to shoot better by switching. Other people may disagree.Were you shooting 2" groups with a varmint rifle at 300 yards when you saw the big improvement ? Was it range brass or new brass ?
LMAO Your always $500 away from tighter groupsmo money, mo money, mo money...