Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LC is fine brass,I doubt Lapua brass is the magic he is looking for .Seating depth would be my first thing to experiment with. 77s at 2.260" is an AR mag-length round...that's a long bullet and will probably shoot better seated out longer.Maybe consider switching to Lapua brass. I would guess it would be way more consistent than LC.
Because I saw significant improvement in accuracy when I switched from Lc brass to Lapua in my 223. Lc brass is not as consistent as Lapua, primer pockets were more consistent, ND was more consistent. I would take a guess that would have a potential impact in better accuracy and groupings.Why would you think that is the magic he needs without any real info ?
Were you shooting 2" groups with a varmint rifle at 300 yards when you saw the big improvement ? Was it range brass or new brass ?Because I saw significant improvement in accuracy when I switched from Lc brass to Lapua in my 223. Lc brass is not as consistent as Lapua, primer pockets were more consistent, ND was more consistent. I would take a guess that would have a potential impact in better accuracy and groupings.
if you're not neck turning, I'd say that's your problem. Uneven neck tension. Are you using a bushing die?The powder charge was worked up and this is the best I could get. I even tried different powders and RL 15 came out the best groups. Taking your advice I will work with the seating depth.
Slightly better, I don’t remember define number but I do know seating consistency and concentricity improved. Point being I found my rifle to shoot better by switching. Other people may disagree.Were you shooting 2" groups with a varmint rifle at 300 yards when you saw the big improvement ? Was it range brass or new brass ?
LMAO Your always $500 away from tighter groupsmo money, mo money, mo money...