Yep. Same result. I used it to get a precise center point for the group since it will calculate the middle of a group.
so are you saying that 38.5 is your low node ? and 40 is your high ?Erik Cortina said:I found this target, and I think it's a perfect example of how some people might choose the wrong load because they fell in love with a group without reading the groups properly. This target was shot with my 6.5x47 Lapua and 139 gr. Lapua Scenars with VV N550 powder.
At plain sight, 38.5 gr. appears to be the best group, but if you look at the groups next to it they don't hit the target on the same place vertically in relation to the bull's eye. The load is not stable and this load would cause problems when moving further out because it is not inside the accuracy node.
However, loads 39.5, 40.0, and 40.5 are vertically in the same place in relation to the bull's eye. This is the accuracy node for powder charge, my next step would be to load 40.0 gr. and adjust seating depth and bring the group in and done, I now have a load that would shoot out to 1,000 yards. Also, when the groups line up vertically, the speed also varies very little over the chronograph for the loads that line up on target, it appears that the speed flat lines for a while before it starts to jump up again, this is where you want to be.
![]()
savageshooter86 said:38.5 is not a node here. Look how it hits almost even with the horizontal line on the target. Then notice how the 38.0 hits lower than 38.5. And then look at 39.0 it hits higher than 38.5 and 38. So this is not a node
savageshooter86 said:I used OnTarget to plot the center of my groups and chose the 3 that hit closest POI vertically off my POA. Then chose the middle charge like you do. Then I played with seating depth to get the smallest group with the charge I selected. I trusted OnTarget to calculate it more precisely than my eyes could. Used the measuring and scale function in the program to get it accurate.
Yep. I used Dan Newberry OCW method which is very similar to your way. Seems to workI pick the three that shoot the same place vertically based on POA, even if they are the farthest away from POA.
Nomad47 said:Erik, I'm fairly sure you use QuickLoad. Do you also use Chris Long's OBT theory? If so, how did the 40 grain charge work out to one of Chris' nodes?
zfastmalibu said:Eric, How big are those groups after you tune the seating depth, and how much vertical at 1k are they giving you? Have you ever had a gun that did not print like that? My groups tent to follow a sine wave pattern, usually the groups that print highest or lowest (when the barrel is at the end of it whip) will give the least vertical and best groups. I shoot a dasher and find my windows are small, if I load .2 either way the load will get vertical.
Thanks
aj300mag said:Erik,
Did you rerun the 100 yard group with the three loads (39.5, 40.0 & 40.5) once you established the seating depth? Did you see any vertical/ horizontal stringing if you did?
Dgd6mm said:Erik,
Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
Don Dunlap
Trapper243 said:I will double the thanks. That was a worthy read.
Erik Cortina said:You need to read the groups, not shots on the group.
Like I said, most people will go with 38.5 and they will be wrong.
Look at 38.0 and 39.0, the groups don't line up with 38.5 vertically.
Now, look at 39.5 - 40.5, the groups line up vertically on the target.